Archive for Boris Karloff

Wind

Posted in FILM with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on April 13, 2024 by dcairns

“Gee, I shout all the way through this picture.” ~ Steve Martin, on rewatching THE JERK.

Will Hay might not be such an Awful British Comedian. He has his wearing qualities, but he’s undoubtedly a skilled character man, and the films aren’t all bad. Some of them even seem like proper films.

Hay was immensely popular, but then so was Norman Wisdom, so that doesn’t get him out of trouble necessarily. He was well enough known for Michael Redgrave to attempt a brief impersonation in THE LADY VANISHES, without anyone pausing to wonder how this would play in the US.

Hay began as a Fred Karno comic, postdating Chaplin and Laurel, He was a man of many parts, an amateur astronomer who discovered or anyway confirmed the spot on Saturn.

Hay’s heyday was in the late thirties to the early fifies, same as George Formby’s. Hay’s stuff is more sophisticated, there’s some mild satire in there. Unlike Formby and Wisdom, who amused children by personating them, Hay amused children and adults by playing a very stupid adult, a man who at least knows that he’s supposed to be adult, supposed to know things, have dignity, etc. He played officious authority figures too incompetent to actually project any real authority.

Hay does not exactly have a funny face. Homely, yes. A popular radio comedian, his first feature, RADIO PARADE OF 1935 reveals him with an austere crew cut that makes him look like Boris Karloff in THE BLACK CAT. Karloff could do comedy but he did not have a face for fun. Hay’s later floppy little fringe and pince-nez emphasised his twit aspect, and probably made it easy for him to go unrecognized in public. Lose the specs, stop scowling, adjust his hair and he’d be fairly anonymous.

Hay’s career straddles the two major makers of Awful British Comedian films, Gainsborough and Ealing, both of whom are better know for other stuff — costume pictures and delightful little comedies starring proper actors.

We first ran OH, MISTER PORTER! (1937), a popular early entry, a knock-off of Arnold Ridley’s THE GHOST TRAIN, filmed directly three times and ripped off several more. A Scooby-Doo plot of fake haunting as cover for a gun-smuggling ring. Cue fight in warehouse.

Hay, as a stuffy and inept branch manager of a Northern Irish railway station, is actually part of a trio here. He’d co-starred with Graham Moffat, a chubby youth who initially played schoolboys, always called Albert, in WHERE THERE’S A WILL, WINDBAG THE SAILOR and GOOD MORNING, BOYS! Now the duo was joined by Moore Marriott. Moffat was a child who kept on playing children after he’d grown up, whereas Marriott was a young man who kept playing old men after he got old. His stylisation and makeup (Irish beard, blacked-out teeth) didn’t change no matter how close in years he got to the relics he was portraying. Here he’s younger than me.

All three are gifted clowns. Hay is very broad, and if he has a vice it’s shouting. It’s natural that he should do it, his character is a parody of the petty jobsworths known and hated throughout Britain. But it can be wearing. Marriott can match him bellow for bellow, just in a higher octave. The one bit of truly brilliant filmmaking in OMP comes when, during a steam chase wherein the cast have been bellowing doubletalk at each other for what feels like ten minutes, screeching over the incessant clatter of their locomotive, ubiquitous French helmer Marcel Varnel cuts to a station office in sudden, shocking silence. It’s a genuinely dazzling moment, but it has nothing to do with comedy.

But apparently this went down a storm at the CInematheque when Bertrand Tavernier screened it, the French delighted to see one of their own triumphing in a damp climate. Subtitling would have helped, though I pity whoever had the job.

Varnel, co-director of CHANDU THE MAGICIAN (he did the bad bits, I think) — ah, the Lugosi connection again! — made a lot of movies with Hay, Formby, the Crazy Gang and others. He has a kind of anti-gift for visual gags, framing too close (an obsessive flaw of 30s and 40s comedy — even Preston Sturges, a sincere lover of slapstick, shoots it as if it were dialogue) and cutting too often and in exactly the worst places. But there are laughs here. The prolonged “thrilling” chase seems to have become a staple, though Formby was already trying for Big Finishes in his own gawky way.

My favourite aspect of this film was Graham Moffat, because he’s relatively understated, the opposite of what you expect child comedians to be. I suppose his fat and sleepy qualities excused him from overacting. In a way he’s sort of exhibiting himself rather than feeling obliged to give a performance. He retired to run a pub, but would make a comeback whenever asked, even cropping up in MOTHER RILEY MEETS THE VAMPIRE. Hay seems to have gotten fed up sharing screen time with Marriott and Moffat, and broke up the act, saying he had no wish to be one third of a three-legged race. But his subsequent films tend to paste him together with twit Claude Hulbert, and another superannuated schoolboy, Charles Hawtrey, so he never really escaped the ensemble. He’s not quite the kind of comic who can carry a whole film surrounded by straight stooges — you need supporting clowns.

We ran THE GHOST OF ST MICHAEL’S because it’s set in Scotland and has Hulbert and Hawtrey as well as Raymond Huntley and John Laurie — British cinema’s resident Gloomy Scot, who recites the ghostly legend, a role he also undertook in OLD MOTHER RILEY’S GHOSTS. Will plays an inept schoolteacher (his most frequent guise) uncovering a Nazi spy in a Gothic castle schoolhouse. Interesting to see Ealing try for a Universal horror look. Fiona liked this better. There are delightfully crappy tabletop miniatures (other Hay films have more ambitious VFX) and there’s less shouting. Hay seems to have had an affinity for terror — all three comics get trapped in an infernal chamber with a Fu Manchu descending ceiling. Quite a bit of shouting there.

Hawtrey is a genuinely uncanny figure. Emaciated and VERY camp, he specialised in schoolboys for decades (he even wanders through shot in Hitchcock’s SABOTAGE) despite being seemingly born with a nonagenarian’s voice. As a sort of pixilated queen he became a CARRY ON regular in later life, in which context hilarity was conjured by having him compete romantically with Kenneth Williams (a queen of the more acid variety) for the hand of fat lady Hattie Jacques. A very British form of absurdism.

Realising that Hay co-directed two films with Basil Dearden, a proper director, I had to try one. I ended up watching both. THE GOOSE STEPS OUT used to be seen as a bit of a classic, but has faded into obscurity. The addition of Dearden as director makes an immediate obvious difference: though Varnel is quite smooth and elegant in his movements, with Dearden we get proper dramatic camera angles. Hay plays an officious twit of a schoolteacher (again) with an accidental resemblance to a Nazi spy. British Intelligence, who number the great John Williams (DIAL M FOR MURDER) among their ranks, parachute him behind enemy lines to replace his likealook teaching Hitler Youth to pass for British, with his secret mission being to steal an experimental Gas Fire Bomb. The Hitler Youth include Barry Morse of Space: 1999, a willowy young Peter Ustinov, and the inevitable Charles Hawtrey.

Best scene is Hay teaching the Hitlerjugend British mannerisms, witless stuff really but somehow very gratifying — fascism reduced to the ridiculous. Most Hay films have a setpiece lesson where he has to witter on about something he knows nothing about. This is a rogue variant as he’s spewing deliberate misinformation. There’s a very prolonged aeroplane climax with non-convincing but eager effects work from Roy Kellino. Special effects are never as good as real stunts (models don’t understand about timing), but none of this stuff could have been done full-scale (they nearly do a GORGO on Big Ben), except turning the plane interior upside down, which they have fun with.

The film is fainthearted in its antifascism — none of the Nazis is killed, proving my earlier point (see THE CAMELS ARE COMING) that cold-blooded comic murder was reserved for non-whites.

Or almost: MY LEARNED FRIEND, Hay’s last film, made in ’43 but set before the war to excuse it having no wartime references, is a comedy of murder, a real precursor of Ealing’s KIND HEARTS AND CORONETS and THE LADYKILLERS. Hay departs from his usual character, playing a crooked barrister, inept certainly but possessed of a certain low vegetable cunning. His mark is Claude Hulbert, hired to prosecute him, fired for failing to secure a conviction, and then lured into business with the erstwhile accused.

But a dissatisfied former client is after Hay — he’s played by Mervyn Johns in a rehearsal for his psychopathic act in DEAD OF NIGHT (which was Dearden again, among others). Johns’ psycho explains he’s bumping off the six people he blames for his conviction, and he’s saving Hay for last. So the duo rush about trying and failing to save the other entries on the kill list. Surprisingly, these are not played by notable guest stars, but we do get a substantial cameo from Ernest Thesiger as a lunatic, and an insubstantial one from the reliably dwarfish Ian Wilson.

What’s impressive here, apart from Hay finding a new way to use his air of seediness, is the sheer nastiness of the comedy. One victim is done in with a tiger trap created by Thesiger with the murderer’s connivance — a POV shot shows not only a fatal drop but spikes at the bottom. Remove that and you’d simply have an amusing trapdoor demise. With it, the thing becomes painful and frightening.

Another victim is a gangster, ‘Safety’ Wilson, known by that nickname because he slashes up victims with a safety razor embedded in a cosh, a device that gets its own bloodcurdling closeups. It feels so worryingly specific it must have been in the newspapers at the time, part of the tabloid press’s usual panics about social disorder. It’s not remotely amusing, but it’s impressively grim.

For his penultimate crime, Johns plans to blow up the House of Lords (!), which leads to a Harold Lloyd type cliffhanger on the face of Big Ben — “borrowed” by the ’78 remake of THE 39 STEPS. This kind of thing never quite works with process shots, but Michael Relph’s sets are impressive and the comic terror of the protags is amusing. It feels oddly too innocent a climax to a comedy of murder (Dearden would attempt another homicide farce, THE GREEN MAN, but got removed from it — why, I wonder?)

I remember reading about the scene in, I think, Millar and Reisz’s book The Technique of Film Editing. To get the laugh to work when Hay & Hulbert rush through a door and find themselves teetering on a platform below the clockface and above the city, the editor (Charles Hasse – DEAD OF NIGHT) discovered he had to revert to the non-continuity style of early 1900s cutting — inside the clock tower, we watch them rush through the door — cut to exterior — and the door OPENS AGAIN and they RUSH THROUGH AGAIN. The repetition was essential, he felt, to create audience anticipation and therefore suspense.)

Ill health sadly forced Hay into retirement after this one. It’s tempting to wonder what he might have gotten up to in post-war cinema, but it’s also possible that losing this big earner pushed Ealing into making less comedian-centred comedies. It’s curious that, while the War generally raised the ambitions of everyone making movies in Britain, Ealing didn’t hit their stride until a few years after peace broke out.

Verdict: Will Hay is Not Actually Awful, and I can even see myself watching the other films in my purchased-on-a-whim box set.

STOP PRESS: already chalked up ASK A POLICEMAN and HEY! HEY! USA! and both are of interest. Stay tuned.

Midnight Oil

Posted in FILM with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on February 27, 2024 by dcairns

Had a weird Melvin LeRoy double feature the other night. Two wildly contrasting films from the thirties.

Precode TONIGHT OR NEVER is one of Gloria Swanson’s first talkies, she plays an opera singer as she would in MUSIC IN THE AIR. I guess everyone knew she was past the ingenue stage so she went straight to prima donnas. The pre-code content is basically that everyone says that she has great technique but lacks passion, basically because she’s never been laid. Alison Skipworth plays a retired ballerina who says she was complimented once that “I sang not with my mouth, but with my….!” Arse? And Melvyn Douglas, very dapper, is a young man who may be Skipworth’s gigolo, Jim. The G word is spoken multiple times.

Gregg Toland shoots in beautiful studio and miniature recreations of Venice and Budapest.

OIL FOR THE LAMPS OF CHINA was made in 1935, so post-code, but for Warners, so it still has some balls. Unlike lead Pat O’Brien who plays a company man selling Chinese oil back to the Chinese. Apparently based on a novel emphasising straight romance and exoticism, the Warner makeover turns it, mostly, into a searing indictment of capitalist exploitation and one man’s pitiable devotion to his faceless employer.

What the films have in common is a tendency to have their characters repeat these themes ad nauseam. TONIGHT is rather a snooze for that reason — the Belasco theatre production it’s based on must have been dull as dishwater, but in opening it out the scenarists have added a few more repetitions — all right, we get it, Swanson REALLY needs to get her oats. OIL works better because O’Brien’s repeated oaths of loyalty to the company — “It’s my whole identity!” are at least wrongheaded, so the theme emerges less directly.

Fiona was taken with Pat’s leading lady, so I looked her up and discovered we’d seen her before. Josephine Hutchinson was Elsa Von Frankenstein in SON OF FRANKENSTEIN and Mrs Lester Townsend — James Mason’s fake wife — in NORTH BY NORTHWEST. Well I’ll be.

I can easily forgive TONIGHT OR NEVER because 1931 was the year LeRoy made SEVEN feature films. He’s entitled to a couple of duds. (I wonder what the two Joe E. Brown films are like?) He does film it smoothly, but if the writer hasn’t injected life then the director and actors will be powerless.

Another man having a busy 1931 was Boris Karloff, playing a smarmy waiter here, and T, Vernon Isopod, Sport Williams, Cokey Joe, Mustafa, Tony Ricca, Luigi – Pancheco’s Butler, Fedor’s Father, “Terry,” The Professor, and a certain nameless monster elsewhere.

OIL is pretty incredible, if consistently depressing — I couldn’t LOVE it, but I was very glad to have seen it.

TONIGHT OR NEVER star Norma Desmond; Penderel; Madame Barabbas; Mr.Throstle; Hives – the Butler; Dr. Watson; Lola’s Masseuse;

OIL FOR THE LAMPS OF CHINA stars Detective Mulligan; Elsa Von Frankenstein; Helena – In Love with Demetrius; Chick Carter; Sir Joseph Whemple; Lon Preiser; Battling Burrows; Confucius; The Chump Ernest Brown; Pfiffer; M’ling; Dr. Emile Roux; Jeff as a Boy; Pig Show Attendee (uncredited); Lee Chan; Captain Anderson; Visakha; Mr. Osato;

Monster Rally

Posted in FILM with tags , , , , , , , , , , on October 27, 2023 by dcairns

I wonder why, when Universal took to packaging their monsters together, they didn’t include the Mummy?

Technically, even the Invisible Man gets to join the tag-team franchise at the end of ABBOT AND COSTELLO MEET FRANKENSTEIN (or, as the main title claims it’s called, BUD ABBOT LOU COSTELLO MEET FRANKENSTEIN). But the bandaged Egyptian is left out in the cold.

I would argue that the Mummy and Dracula belong together better than either with the Frankenstein monster. True, all three of them are reanimated dead dudes, but the monster is the product of science, which puts him in a different fictional universe. You can’t have vampirism AND mad science, that’s known as double voodoo.

Anyway, Karl Freund’s THE MUMMY is practically a remake of Tod Browning’s DRACULA. Maybe that makes them two similar to pair up. It’d be like a double act with two fat guys. They’d just agree about everything. Being dead is bad, but girls are nice, sort of like that.

Dracula and the Wolfman also seem compatible, as the TWILIGHT and UNDERWORLD sagas would eventually strive to demonstrate. Both are cursed types, you could say. But when they finally come face to fuzzy face in MEET FRANKENSTEIN, after largely missing each other in the two HOUSE OFs — spooks that pass in the night — they don’t exactly see eye to eye.

So I think teaming those two might have made a better combo, as a first attempt at this kind of compendium sequel, than FRANKENSTEIN MEETS THE WOLFMAN, in which the title for the first time refers to the monster by his creator’s name. I mean, the title might be talking about Ilona Massey’s Elsa Frankenstein, but nobody reads it that way, with all due respect to Elsa.

Per Wikipedia, HOUSE OF D was originally to be titled WOLF MAN VS DRACULA, that “versus” promising more than a mere social encounter, however tense. Shoehorning the monster in (you need a big shoehorn) seems to have happened after the censors objected to the original project (not sure how adding the monster makes it less censorable) and during a brief period when Karloff had signed a deal at Universal and it was imagined he might want to return for a last monster rally.

I like John Carradine fine but I do wish they’d asked Bela back. If you’re going to have the Frankenstein monster and Dracula in a movie together, and I’m not suggesting you should, they ought at least to be played by Karloff and Lugosi. But Karloff didn’t fancy going through all that again. Another reason for centring things on the Wolf Man, at least the original actor (Henry Hull doesn’t count) was still playing him.

Even the Invisible Man and the Frankenstein monster would be a better match — both the products of mad science, both the products of James Whale. I think Jesus Franco may have made a film about that… or did I dream it, in one of my more low-budget nightmares?

Well, as long as we’re thinking crossovers…