
Enjoyed Elvis Mitchell’s documentary IS THAT BLACK ENOUGH FOR YOU? on Netflix — an appreciation of “blaxploitation” that doesn’t get particularly in-depth on any given topic but turns up a lot of interesting stuff. The field, it turns out, is too broad for a single documentary
One film I’d never heard of before caught my eye — TRAIN RIDE TO HOLLYWOOD (1975), starring Bloodstone, a band I’d never heard of, and directed by one Charles R. Rondeau, a filmmaker I’d never heard of, though I guess I’ve seen his work, growing up, on TV shows from Batman to The Gemini Man. The newly designed IMDb makes it hard to separate film from TV but Rondeau seems to have helmed a couple of bona fide features in the early sixties, THE LITTLEST HOBO, THE THREAT, DEVIL’S PARTNER, all of which seem small and a touch odd. This was his last hurrah or hrumph in the actual movie business, and it’s fittingly a love letter.
Bloodstone, a doo-wop/r&b/soul/funk/oldies band, take the titular train journey alongside W.C. Fields (a remarkable impersonation by Bill Oberlin and no, I hadn’t heard of him either), Humphrey Bogart (Guy Marks, who can do the voice but bears no resemblance), Jean Harlow, Rhett Butler & Scarlett O’Hara, and Dracula (Jay Robinson from QUO VADIS THE ROBE, doing an excellent Lugosi). Musical numbers obtrude, but a plot does not. It’s a peculiar ride.
It seems possible to me that Harry Williams, playing himself, has been dubbed by Scatman Crothers, but I can’t prove it.
Anyway, there are intertitles — for no special reason, the film turns sepia and silent — I guess because there’s a Sheikh aboard and this is harking back to a still earlier era, though no resemblance to Valentino is attempted. The sleeping car is entirely taken up with the harem, and a bit of bedroom farce is trotted out when the night’s wife turns out to be entertaining a lover. The head transplant routine from GENTLEMEN PREFER BLONDES is attempted, with the wife’s head protruding from the curtains above her lover’s (smooth and shapely) legs. Which is reasonably funny, but the intertitles being written in a modern style is funnier:




The film isn’t quite inventive enough — Rondeau isn’t a huge stylist and he’s obviously dealing with a limited budget — but it’s a likable curate’s egg. It evokes a nostalgia, not for the thirties or forties, but for the seventies, when all those old movies were on late night TV all the time and everybody would have got the references. It’s still strange to me that there’s a couple of generations toddling about for whom Jean Harlow conveys nothing.
