Archive for The Wild Bunch

Without a Sound

Posted in FILM with tags , , , , , , , , , , on January 3, 2016 by dcairns


Looking at LONE WOLF AND CUB: SWORD OF VENGEANCE and SAMURAI WOLF, and am blow away by the use of sound in these 60s and 70s Japanese samurai flicks. What’s impressive is not so much the steely clashes as the silence around them.

SWORD OF VENGEANCE director Kanji Misumi uses one particularly lucid technique to heighten his swordplay. Much of the film consists of flashbacks depicting how jowly protagonist Tomisaburo Wakayama became a masterless ronin. These flashbacks tend to feature water — rain, a rushing weir. But the water makes no sound. An eeriness is created, from which the shrill clang of blades emerges with alarming clarity. There’s basically no atmos whatsoever, so that the sound mixer’s golden rule — always be having something going on — is abandoned. The audience is always quieter when the film is quiet. We fear our movements will give us away, revealing our position to potential enemies elsewhere in the auditorium, or to the giant, godlike figures on the screen. Heaven help you if you attract their attention.


Of course, Misumi’s choice also helps distinguish flashbacks from present tense.

Hideo Gosha’s slick SAMURAI WOLF uses silence as the sound of death. Normal sound is cut off with the swipe of a sword — we lose the whistling wind sound, the cries of the dying victim continue for a second, and then get flicked off as with the throw of a switch — this seems to follow the advent of slomo, as a kind of delayed after-effect. As with Kurosawa (THE SEVEN SAMURAI) and Peckinpah after him (THE WILD BUNCH) slomo is the speed of the dying man, that adrenalin shot of death-trauma putting your last moments into a slurred timescape, a last chance to put your thoughts in order before oblivion reels you in. And with no sounds to distract you — how thoughtful of someone.


The last great repository of silence may be the anime, where, since every sound is added afterwards anyway, Japanese filmmakers still occasionally withhold an effect. Miyazaki does neat things with the SIZE of sounds too — in TOTORRO, the titular nature spirit is big and noisy, but in an extreme long shot he can alight with a comical PLOP, like a fat raindrop. In Otomo’s AKIRA, Tokyo blows up in the opening shot, a black bubble of destruction which spreads and bursts without a single sound, the audio vacuum somehow suggesting a roar too great for any cinema’s speakers.

Hatchet Job

Posted in FILM, literature, Television with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on June 23, 2015 by dcairns


Sam Peckinpah’s TV play, Noon Wine, based on the short novel by Katherine Anne Porter, occupies a legendary position in his oeuvre, because it turned his career around when he was at a low ebb, making everything afterwards possible (although it’s THE WILD BUNCH which created his unstoppable momentum in the next decade), and also because it’s been almost impossible to see.

After being shut out of the editing room on the troubled MAJOR DUNDEE (Charlton Heston wondered why Orson Welles and Sam Peckinpah, so charming to their actors when they wanted to be, could not turn that charm on the moneymen; Peckinpah wrote to his producer, “You are a well-poisoner, Jerry, and I damn you for it”), and after being fired from THE CINCINATTI KID after allegations that he tried to shoot hardcore pornography on the MGM lot (screenwriter Terry Southern claimed, plausibly, that it was his idea of adding an interracial love scene that freaked out the suits; but see also Susan George’s allegations about Peckinpah’s initial plans for the rape scene in STRAW DOGS, which tends to support suspicions about the director’s enthusiasm for what might be termed “sexual realism”) — anyhow, after all that, nobody was willing to touch Peckinpah.


This low-budget TV play demonstrated that Peckinpah could be trusted to turn up, shoot to schedule, and get great reviews. What’s weird is how shonky Noon Wine is. Admittedly, the source material screened at Edinburgh International Film Festival, supplied by UCLA, may not have shown the film at it’s best — though this may be the best surviving material. It looks to have been shot on tape, filmed off a TV screen, and then dumped back onto digital, but it’s hard to be sure. The colour is streaky, the image sometimes displaying a tubular edge distortion, and the resolution is low, and there’s also the unpleasantly smooth, HOBBIT-like video movement, though one soon gets used to that.

The piece is obviously cheap as chips, with laughable production design in the courtroom scene — blank stage flats painted in streaks to try to add a spurious sense of detail. But much low-budget TV still impresses, due to story and acting and framing. Noon Wine is erratic in all of these aspects.

Technically, the piece is below the standard of most TV of the period, with music unconvincingly papering over gaps in the soundtrack where Peckinpah seems to have shot mute. The only visual sequences which don’t look flatly televisual are the frequent montages, layerings of lap dissolves to show time passing. Generally, whenever Peckinpah mucks about with lap dissolves, wipes, freeze frames, ripple dissolves or accelerated motion, I cringe. These examples aren’t outright offensive, but they get a little embarrassing sometimes.


Olivia DeHavilland is good, naturally. Jason Robards SHOUTS all the time, just like Steve Martin in THE JERK. Per Oscarsson is outstanding. Whenever I see him, I always think, Who is this strange man, where did he come from and what’s he doing here? I even saw him in a Swedish film, DR GLAS, and thought the same thing. So he’s perfect to play what the script calls “a stranger in a strange land.” Theodore Bikel essays a range of characterful tics including a Magoo chortle, and seems to have strayed in from another, more amusing but far worse film.

The story seems predicated upon an ambiguous event (an unseen axe murder) like the Marabar Caves in A Passage to India, but Peckinpah struggles to make the unclear clear. His use of monologues, internal monologues, expository dialogue and more montages is frequently awkward. I realized that Peckinpah’s movies are almost never solo writing jobs, though his work on The Rifleman and The Westerner on TV showed he could get the job done OK when he had to. But he never had to solve all the narrative problems of a feature script without help.


It feels almost ungrateful to get a rare chance to see something like this projected, and not like it better. But that leaves the enduring mystery of how Peckinpah’s career got rebooted by a tiny TV play that isn’t very good. The most interesting thing about it, to me, was that the film, so little seen but so significant in its repercussions for Peckinpah, is like the offscreen murder itself — it is responsible for everything that happens afterwards, but in itself it is unknowable, unseeable and impossible to understand.

I was just thinking, “Now all we need is Nick Ray’s The High Green Wall” — and then I thought to check YouTube and here it is! Hope it’s good.

Euphoria #9

Posted in FILM, MUSIC with tags , , , , , , , , , , on January 5, 2008 by dcairns

Number Nine, Number Nine, Number Nine…

Regular reader and primo Shadowplay supporter Ed Park suggests this glimpse of the cinematic sublime, from Wes Anderson’s THE ROYAL TENENBAUMS:

Ed writes, “Wes Anderson, Gwyneth, Luke Wilson, and Nico’s finest moment—”

Before breaking off in sheer ecstasy. But once he has Gathered Himself, he continues:

“I think it’s the high point of the film and of the whole oeuvre, just beautiful, devastating. I’d always loved that Nico song, had a whole “history” with it (I bought the album in ’92 while living in Korea, it became a soundtrack for me in an unfamiliar city) but this scene is so strong it completely supplanted my own memories….and I don’t mind a bit!”

Nice to have some Modern Cinema Euphoria in the mix. Very helpfully INDEED, Ed then supplies a piece he wrote on the film for the excellent Cinema Scope magazine, from which I’ll quote. This first part is the most eloquent and sympathetic reading of The Wes I’ve ever read:

“Anderson is, in a sense, deeply unfashionable: Uninterested in passing judgment on his characters, evading easy dramatics, he locates every character’s essential good nature with great economy, much of it through stylized locutions and telling wardrobe choices. Thus the jokes and the eye candy are not just sugar filigree but highly nutritious. Indeed, they’re crucial to his semi-fabulist but wholly sympathetic worldview, which extends from the lovingly anonymous American locale of Rushmore’s campus and dream-industrial environs to Tenenbaums’ storybook New York.”

That's just one man's opinion.  

And then, even more helpfully, Ed finishes on THE VERY SCENE:

“You can watch, again and again, as the sadness slips off Gwyneth Paltrow’s Margot Tenenbaum—emerging from a bus to find Luke Wilson’s awestruck, world-weary Richie waiting at the station, as Nico’s plangent “These Days” executes some rapturous alchemy of sunlight and lost time. Sic transit gloria, Max would say. But not as long as this scene is close to hand, ready for repeated unfoldings.”


I enjoyed hearing from my cinematographer pal Scott Ward how Anderson only ever uses the one lens,which is ideal for those Lesterish tableau shots he likes so much. Made me think of a Crime Story, a CAPER, in which some Anderson-hater (my friend Comrade K might be good in the role [although come to think of it, he does like some Anderson]) STEALS the Anderson Lens, and Wes is unable to make any more films until he gets it back. I mean, he can’t just go out and buy another one, right?

Wait, he can? Damn. They say the popularity of the mobile phone has ruined certain plot devices, but I bet Lens Shops have been just as destructive.


Anyhow, Miss Paltrow’s slo-mo promenade calls to mind the definitive Walk Thing, from Peckinpah’s THE WILD BUNCH. “I wanna do a Walk Thing,” declared Bloody Sam to his crew, and nobody knew what he meant. Now the Walk Thing is such a movie standard that groups of people walking purposely towards a long lens at 50 fps simply cannot be done, except as self-conscious spoofery (Peckinpah’s original is actually at normal speed).

But a single person can still get away with it, as Gwyneth, in her finest ever role, demonstrates admirably here.

Walk it Down

Was also thinking some Goosebump Moments and Moments That Make You Cry might be good… for later.