Bar Sinister


Ominous watering holes: one from BLACK WIDOW, one from THE THIRD DAY.
BLACK WIDOW is a mystery-thriller from writer-director Nunnally Johnson in Gorgeous Lifelike Color by Deluxe, Cinemascope, and Stereophonic Sound. It’s a reasonably well-conceived puzzle with an ungainly structure — it takes forever to arrive at the stage where a who has dunnit, and we have to sit through a long flashback that introduces a shoal of red herrings to occlude a crime yet to occur. All with a Broadway backdrop. “Write ALL ABOUT EVE as a murder mystery!” seems to have been the command from Zanuck or whoever.

Van Heflin is OK as the hero caught in a web of deceit — Gene Tierney has a nothing role as his wife. Ginger Rogers and Reginald Gardiner — Schultz from THE GREAT DICTATOR — make an improbably couple, but it works storywise. Ginger overplays her bitch-queen of Broadway character horribly but then pulls off a bit of a triumph at the end, proving again that “Ginger can play anything she can understand.” It takes so long for a murder victim to step forward that it feels like a spoiler to tell you that it’s Peggy Ann Garner, who is excellent, she makes you want more flashbacks.



You also get George Raft and Virginia Leith (Jan in the Pan from THE BRAIN THAT WOULDN’T DIE) and Skip Homeier, the creepy psycho kid from THE GUNFIGHTER. So you can’t complain. The best perf, however, is from Hilda Simms (above right), who got her one big break in THE JOE LOUIS STORY and has a couple of brief expository scenes which she delivers with such honest simplicity as to steal the show.
Kind of want to see THE JOE LOUIS STORY now.
In theory this is a Hitchcockian subject but there are few sequences of visual suspense, just a nice paranoid feeling of a trap closing in. Nunnally J. favours beautiful, theatrical wides, which look nice especially when there’s a scenic artist’s rendition of New York out the window. They’re not exactly fraught with tension but they work for the swellegant theaterland atmosphere.



What BLACK WIDOW has in common with THE THIRD DAY is that they’re both undemanding, time-passing, underpowered thrillers. They kind of forget to be thrilling, or else they don’t know what thrilling is. And yet they’re crowded with talent.



In THE THIRD DAY, George Peppard has total amnesia, and yet there’s no narrative reason for this except to make an excuse for exposition — the audience gets fed the plot and character set-up along with George. The story only really needs him to have amnesia with regard to the Chappaquidick-style car crash in which his companion of the night, Sally Kellerman (in flashback), perished.
But IS there a story? Too many stories, perhaps. There are business wheelings and dealings with conniving relative Roddy McDowall, there’s the crusading DA Robert Webber who wants to nail George for murder, there’s his estranged wife Elizabeth Ashley to be unestranged, and there’s Kellerman’s vengeful piano-playing cuckold husband, the remarkable Arte Johnson. I remember him as one of the sinister CEA agents in THE PRESIDENT’S ANALYST, who are all comically short. It’s quite strange to have a fight to the finish between little Arte and big George as the climax to this thing, but they do give AJ a gun. And what he lacks in height he makes up for in sheer malevolence.



I was interested in Elizabeth Ashley since we’ve loved her in Russian Doll, and I read about her in Mark Harris’ magnificent Mike Nichols bio, but I’d never seen her young. She’s striking. Very mobile face, making her hard to framegrab without making her look like a deranged mutant, but when you’re actually watching she’s fascinating and doesn’t seem remotely grotesque. I feel actors in general could get away with more facial movement. We also get Vincent Gardenia and Mona Washburne, which is a nice surprise, and Herbert Marshall, playing a guy with total paralysis to match Peppard’s total amnesia. This movie doesn’t do anything by halves, except everything.
This is Herbert Marshall’s entire performance:

Both these films needed Hitchcock but they have Nunnally Johnson and Jack Smight, preposterously unsuitable substitutes. Smight attempts some psychedelic transitions into the fatal crash flashbacks, but given the hero’s supposedly disorientated condition he could have tilted the whole thing much more into delirium. Robert Surtees’ photography is lovely and I liked the score by Percy Faith, with its emphasis on dreamy harp glissandoes.



BLACK WIDOW stars Kitty Foyle; Charles Bovary; Martha Strabel Van Cleve; Spats Colombo; Jane Eyre as a Child; Schultz; Jan in the Pan; Jules Amthor; Julia Rainbird; Marva Lewis; and Mr. Fearless.
THE THIRD DAY stars Paul Varjak; Ruth Brenner; Cornelius; Parnell Emmett McCarthy; Frau Lang; Gaston Monescu; Juror 12; Dr. Raymond Sanderson; Maj. Margaret ‘Hot Lips’ O’Houlihan; Reverend Sykes; Mushnik; 1st ‘Nameless Broad’; Hedda Hopper; and Spanky’s mother.
August 9, 2022 at 1:55 pm
August 9, 2022 at 4:13 pm
Haven’t seen this film, but I’d like to put in a good word for Smight: HARPER, NO WAY TO TREAT A LADY, FAST BREAK.
August 9, 2022 at 5:32 pm
Smight also directed “Frankenstein:TheTrue Story”, written by Chris and Don
August 9, 2022 at 6:52 pm
Elizabeth Ashley’s unabashed autobiography is worth checking out.
August 9, 2022 at 8:43 pm
August 9, 2022 at 8:59 pm
I used to like No Way to Treat a Lady but I tried it again recently and couldn’t get on with it AT ALL. I actually couldn’t watch it. Harper is perfectly OK, haven’t seen Fast Break. I just think he’s not the kind of stylist this film would need.
Oh, the Ashley memoir sounds enticing…
August 10, 2022 at 3:39 am
I tried three times to post a (snotty) comment about the Jack Smight oeuvre but it seems it was to no avail. Perhaps tomorrow!
August 10, 2022 at 3:41 am
Wait! I have a PLAN!
August 10, 2022 at 3:43 am
Jack Smight’s late sixties, post Harper filmography is a puzzle. He made a handful of movies that should have been good – or at least cool— and probably would have been, if somebody else had directed them. Anybody else.
Maybe that’s unfair, because they all have script problems and Smight didn’t write them, but the stories all feel off in the same way. They’re sour. Visually, they seem off, too, in that late-sixties too-much-zoom lens kind of way. Still, it’s hard to say, because I’ve only seen them on TV in gruesome pan & scan versions… [more]
August 10, 2022 at 3:47 am
…“No Way to Treat a Lady” ought to be a gas. The changes to the original William Goldman novel make it much less dark (in the book, the Lee Remick character is brutally murdered), but also less clever (the novel has two different ‘rival’ serial killers, which the cops don’t realize for a long time). It’s hard to say what goes wrong here, because nothing works. It’s just charmless. Since the leads are peak-period George Segal and Lee Remick, that’s an amazing accomplishment.
“The Illustrated Man” is a mess. (Doing it as a portmanteau film was probably not the way to go, but if that’s what you’re going to do, don’t do it this way)… [more]
August 10, 2022 at 3:49 am
Jack Smight’s late sixties, post Harper filmography is a puzzle. He made a handful of movies that should have been good – or at least cool— and probably would have been, if somebody else had directed them. Anybody else.
Maybe that’s unfair, because they all have script problems and Smight didn’t write them, but the stories all feel off in the same way. They’re sour. Visually, they seem off, too, in that late-sixties too-much-zoom lens kind of way. Still, it’s hard to say, because I’ve only seen them on TV in gruesome pan & scan versions.
“No Way to Treat a Lady” ought to be a gas. The changes to the original William Goldman novel make it much less dark (in the book, the Lee Remick character is brutally murdered), but also less clever (the novel has two different ‘rival’ serial killers, which the cops don’t realize for a long time). It’s hard to say what goes wrong here, because nothing works. It’s just charmless. Since the leads are peak-period George Segal and Lee Remick, that’s an amazing accomplishment… [more]
August 10, 2022 at 3:50 am
Shit. Now it’s just messing with me.
August 10, 2022 at 3:53 am
“The Illustrated Man” is a mess. (Doing it as a portmanteau film was probably not the way to go, but if that’s what you’re going to do, don’t do it this way). “The Traveling Executioner” (1970) is maybe the biggest blown opportunity. Stacy Keach is an ex-carny with HIS OWN ELECTRIC CHAIR, going from prison to prison in post WW I America doing… free lance executions. In the immortal words of William Hurt in History of Violence, “HOW do you fuck THAT UP??” No period feel at all, for one thing. But there are many things.
I’d like to see do-overs of all three of those. [More]
August 10, 2022 at 3:55 am
I haven’t seen his adaptation of John Updike’s “Rabbit Run,” a legendary fiasco. But if you were to ask me ‘what director is least likely to come up with some cinematic equivalent to “The important thing, rather than the subject, was the conversation itself, the quick agreements, the slow nods, the weave of different memories; it was like one of those Panama baskets shaped underwater around a worthless stone”,’ JS would def. be on the short list.
I haven’t seen “Loving Couples” (1980), a ten-years-too-late groovy sex romp with a young Susan Sarandon and a by no means too old Shirley MacLaine, but it’s rated PG. I don’t have high hopes. [END]
August 10, 2022 at 3:56 am
So it’s LENGTH, not SNOTTINESS!
August 10, 2022 at 2:55 pm
Weird. Never had length problems with comments before. But thanks!
Agree that something is very off with Illustrated Man, which has moments which suggest it could have been great. But they use too few stories and make them all too long. I don’t know how much script input JS had but if he had any it clearly didn’t help.
NWTTAL could stand as exhibit a in the case against William Goldman for virulent homophobia, but it would have probably been less egregious if they’d followed his plot.
Damnation Alley is another one that had strong source material — in the original Roger Zelazny story the hero is basically Snake Plissken, only worse — and wound up unbelievably anaemic.
I like how the IMDb plot summary for Fast Break disintegrates into random jottings and word salad: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079136/plotsummary
August 10, 2022 at 2:59 pm
Don’t Forget the film he did for Chris and Don!
August 10, 2022 at 5:57 pm
That TV two-parter had a big impact on me as a kid. I was bound to watch it, being a monster fan and a Tom Baker fan who literally prayed to Tom.