The Fearful Vampire Hunters
I’ve been writing limericks for the run-up to Halloween — you can read them here.

Despite, or maybe in part because of, the outrageous lifts from PSYCHO, part two of Tobe Hooper’s Salem’s Lot TV adaptation satisfied and startled. Fiona screamed several times. It’s fashionable to disparage jump scares, and with the modern soundtrack’s capacity they might seem too easy, somehow, but I think they still have a place in the horror film. I can respect a movie that’s too clever and disquieting to need them, for sure, but for the kind of thing SL is, they absolutely belong.
Stephen King has said that horror comes in three basic shapes — (1) is the subtlest and noblest, the suspense/dread kind, (2) is shock, the jump-scare or startle effect introduced by Tourneur (usually associated with dread and suspense but he liked to mix things up) and (3) is the gross-out. King states that he aims for (1) for preference, but resorts to (2) when necessary, and then to (3) when he has to. The trouble always seemed to me that (2) and (3) can push out (1). But I note that Hitchcock pushed graphic violence in PSYCHO and it HELPED with the dread and suspense, and that the Lewton-Tourneur school purveyed not only subtle psychological tension, but shocks AND had more blood than other ’40s horrors.


The acting in Salem’s Lot helps hugely. Reggie Nalder, as noted by David Ehrenstein, is a formidable living special effect who didn’t even need all the makeup he’s given to be alarming. When you’ve hired Reggie, youdon’t have to paint him blue. As Simon Kane notes, they’ve taken away all his dialogue and that makes him scarier, less human. James Mason’s Mr. Straker is basically playing Renfield, but a Renfield hugely empowered and elevated, suave and cunning and not loony at all, whereas Nalder’s Mr. Barlow is a Dracula degenerated, pure animal will, a semi-sentient walking plague.
Small-parts supporting vampires add to the general mood of abjection: Mason’s real-life wife, Clarissa Kaye-Mason (whom he met while casting for a Miranda to his Prospero in Michael Powell’s never-made THE TEMPEST) gets probably her best onscreen moment; Geoffrey Lewis is fantastically creepy, the screen’s best blue-collar neck-biter; the two kids, Ronnie Scribner and his recruit, Brad Savage are legit terrifying.

Credit also to David Soul, who plays a hero who can actually be terrified. The way you or I would be. I don’t know why this obvious bit of realism isn’t used more often in horror films, other than that you need good actors and you need to spend time showing their reactions. Leading man vanity may also be a factor. But David Soul, rarely discussed as an acting talent, wets himself with real conviction.

The show is peppered with instances where Hooper clearly just didn’t have time for a second take or reshoot, but it succeeds where it counts. It’s impressive that he was able to make the haunted house a memorable, beautifully-designed set that lives up to the two-hour build-up: production designer Mort Rabinowitz does a grand job. The place seems alive with mould. And Barlow’s lair is, magnificently, reached by descending an absent staircase and passing through a tiny, scary door. These bits of architectural surrealism enhance the terror in hard-to-analyse ways. They do make us feel like we’re leaving the domain of the human.




Fiona was much taken with the way Barlow’s recruits are just lying around in the dirt around his coffin. Only he gets a box. Stephen King probably deserves some credit for the way the film makes vampirism seem really grubby and nasty and degraded, a new development in the genre. True, both the Murnau and Herzog NOSFERATUs (from which Nalder’s makeup is derived) associate their head vamp with vermin, and he doesn’t look as sexy as Chris Lee. But at least he has a nice coat. Barlow’s black robe makes him a shapeless mass with a little blue head and hands grafted on, a shred of midnight torn loose and apt to pop into frame from odd angles, and he’s maybe the first screen vampire you gotta assume must smell really bad.
October 22, 2021 at 1:23 pm
Franju has said “anguish” is an emotional key he always aims for. One can see it all over “Les Yeux Sans Visage.” the interesting thing is Franju seldom uses “shock” effects (ie. suddenly cutting to a screaming subject or ghastly presence) His horrors are embedded in the shots.
October 22, 2021 at 1:46 pm
Yes, even though much of the imagery in Les Yeux would have been “shocking” (and still is) – the face peeling off, in particular – it happens slowly, making us suffer rather than flinch. When I first saw the film I was taken aback at the slow pace and lack of conventional tension.
There’s a comparable effect with Franju’s near-opposite, Argento, where the apparent flaws, the strange acting, preposterous plotting and lurid effects, are part of a conscious decision to create the effects of fever. When it works, it works.
October 22, 2021 at 3:44 pm
Franju is a realist at heart. Argento is anything but
October 22, 2021 at 5:10 pm
I also assumed the Herzog Nosferatu vampire smelled horrible, but that was based on the old Isabelle Adjani laser disc commentary track where she prefaced each of her scenes with Kinski by cryptically intoning “keilbasa” or “sardines” or whatever Klaus had been snacking on between takes.
October 22, 2021 at 7:46 pm
Hahaha! Poor Adjani, after her scary/weird father she did not deserve to be put in a room with KK.
October 22, 2021 at 8:26 pm
Franju’s an odd kind of realist. His realism goes hand in hand with surrealism and the silent movie influence…
October 22, 2021 at 8:59 pm
Dammit! Davuid E. You’ve distracted me from grading this afternoon with another of your excellent references.
October 23, 2021 at 2:50 am