Dracula Schmacula
SON OF DRACULA, “starring” Harry Nilsson, “directed” by Freddie Francis and “produced” by Ringo Starr, seems to have been brought into being solely to disabuse me, decades after its creation, of several of my most long-cherished beliefs. These are ~
(1) The 1970s were cool (THE GODFATHER and PULP can be seen advertised in the background of a couple of shots, but they can’t compete with the awful guff going on in the foreground).
(2) The presence of Dennis Price in a vampire film is always a good sign (VAMPYROS LESBOS).
(3) Ringo Starr is a fundamentally well-meaning man who wants me to have a good time (HELP!, CANDY).
(4) Rock musicals with Frankenstein elements are the key to human happiness (ROCKY HORROR, LISZTOMANIA)
(5) Keith Moon was exclusively in very great films (TOMMY, SEXTETTE)
(6) T Rex had alchemical powers which transmuted everything they touched into gold.
(7) Jenny Runacre can make anything cool (THE FINAL PROGRAMME).
(8) Dracula films with motorbikes are cool (THE SATANIC RITES OF DRACULA).
(9) Freddie Jones is the kind of guy you can depend on to learn his lines.
(10) Shakira Caine was only ever in THE MAN WHO WOULD BE KING and never made any films where she turned into a housecat.
All of these self-evident truths, previously held to be inviolate, are thrown into question by this shambling travesty — how shall I go on in a world where NOTHING is certain?
Harry Nilsson is a new kind of Dracula — quiet, authoritative, ginger. He plays the whole thing straight, which might have worked if everybody had gone along with it. After all, the script, by actress Jennifer Jayne working under a pseudonym (wisely), doesn’t actually provide any gags — apart from Dracula Jnr being called Count Down, for no reason. Ringo, as Merlin (what’s Merlin doing in this???), is Ringo. The rest of the rock stars just play music, which is a bit of a waste. The way to redeem this farrago would have been to play it absolutely straight, cutting all the “comedy” which would have taken about three minutes of script revision, and casting inappropriate musicians in all roles. THEN it might have been funny. Freddie Jones as Baron Frankenstein tries, apart from the aforementioned difficulty with the lines (which are often unspeakable sci-fi gibberish, to be fair), but think what Keith Moon could have done! Seized the role by the throat and worried it to death, I should think. And Dennis Price as Van Helsing? Sure, he seems to have sobered up for the day’s work, and Francis shoots him as if he was actually there, in the scene with the other players, which must have been a bewildering change for Price, who was usually filmed to look as much like stock footage as possible (see HORROR HOSPITAL if you don’t believe me), but this has the effect of depriving Peter Frampton of the opportunity to wear a goatee and operate lab equipment. It’s a terrible injustice.
I was slightly surprised that this seriously obscure film, lost in the mists of time and hard drugs, features songs I recognized — that echoing yelling number (Jump into the Fire) that plays during Ray Liotta’s last day as a goodfella in GOODFELLAS, and this —
Extra points for recognizing the space footage swiped from A MATTER OF LIFE AND DEATH. At least Freddie Francis worked on AMOLAD. Did David Niven feel raped? Probably not — he was too busy making VAMPIRA.
Francis apparently had a horrible time on this film — not the world’s greatest director (but one of the greatest cinematographers, as THE INNOCENTS and THE ELEPHANT MAN testify), he found himself employed on a rock folly tax dodge, where the professionalism which was his main attribute as director was not respected or required. He says it led him to give up directing, although one notes that he had not hit bottom yet — he made CRAZE the same year, with Satanist Jack Palance trolling for sacrificial victims in the Raymond Revuebar. The following year’s THE GHOUL and LEGEND OF THE WEREWOLF are shoddy, but mark a slight step up.
The Revuebar is glimpsed here too, in a Swinging London travelogue which actually contains the film’s only moments of visual felicity — a girl walks past and a neon light flicks on offscreen just as she catches the vampire’s eye, causing her to flare red — and the Coke sign’s red wave lights up from top to bottom EXACTLY like a pool of blood flowing downhill.
One odd thing among many — SON OF DRACULA is actually set in the future. An opening title gives the date of Dracula’s staking as “the 1880s” — which is strangely vague, as if the writer is unsure of her facts — and Count Down’s coronation, which takes up most of the plot, is set “a hundred years later” — also, he gets from Transylvania to London via the Channel Tunnel, which did not yet exist in 1974 (it’s represented by an underground car park — this is, after all, a film which boasts of being made “entirely on location”). Yet despite all this, Piccadilly Circus still boasts ads for THE GODFATHER.
Francis would show this blithe disregard for setting again in THE DOCTOR AND THE DEVILS, Dylan Thomas’ Burke and Hare script, belatedly filmed in 1985. Relocating the story to London would have been a perfectly reasonable action, since the characters are all re-named anyway, but Francis inexplicably keeps the Edinburgh locale (with a single location shot of Arthur’s Seat) but has everybody talk in cockney accents. I can understand him not wanting to give himself a migraine by reading the SON OF DRACULA script too closely, but when Dylan Thomas is involved, I think a little more care would be welcome.
I am indebted to Shadowplay informant Danny Carr for reminding me that S.O.D. (“an Apple Production”) existed, thus prompting me to obtain a copy. Remind me to stab him in the forehead next time I see him.




January 25, 2012 at 11:49 am
Countdown. Geddit? (For British readers – ‘be- dup, be- dup, be be de- bu!’)
January 25, 2012 at 11:51 am
For non-British readers — no explanation is worth the effort.
January 25, 2012 at 12:30 pm
Must confess I’d never even heard of this one…but I do rather like CRAZE despite (or perhaps because of) its flamboyant awfulness.
As for DOCTOR AND THE DEVILS, Twiggy and Julian Sands may be lovely people individually – but they make the screen’s all-time least charismatic couple!
January 25, 2012 at 1:29 pm
I’ve read Dylan Thomas’s script and it’s GOOD. It’s not Under Milk Wood, but it’s a thoroughly satisfying, atmospheric and relatively faithful retelling of the Burke and Hare story. You wouldn’t know it from the movie, which doesn’t even change that much, it just renders everything in a spectacularly unsatisfactory manner.
Given decent pulp material, FF could do a fine job, and his oddball bit of fringe theatre, Mumsy, Nanny, Sonny and Girly is a truly startling anomaly.
January 25, 2012 at 4:25 pm
And… RIP Nicol Williamson. The one true Merlin.
January 25, 2012 at 4:34 pm
Back in 1965 Nicholas Ray was scheduled to film The Doctor and the Devils with among others Barbara Steele in the cast. But like so many Ray projects it fell apart at the last minute.
As for Harry. . .
January 25, 2012 at 4:58 pm
James Mason was going to play “Dr Rock”, the Dr Knox surrogate, but the project kept going through so many confusing changes he lost interest. This was during Ray’s most troubled period, in terms of being unable to make his mind up. They were going to shoot in Prague, which is weird, but OK.
Mason played a more benevolent Edinburgh scientist in Journey to the Centre of the Earth.
January 25, 2012 at 5:55 pm
Mason plays a rock doctor in Journey to the Centre of the Earth.
January 25, 2012 at 6:38 pm
Yes he does. Yes, in a way he does.
January 25, 2012 at 8:39 pm
I remember, back in the day, writing a review for a college newspaper telling how I’d rather see the Siodmak SON OF DRACULA than the then-current Francis one.
At least the Francis included this fine Harry Nilsson song …
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JU1lMXe8Ekl
January 25, 2012 at 8:43 pm
(That was supposed to be the song “Remember.”)
January 25, 2012 at 10:50 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JU1IMXe8EkI
January 25, 2012 at 11:05 pm
Nilsson certainly leaves a bizarre and very interesting cinematic legacy. Popeye and Midnight Cowboy and Skidoo…
January 25, 2012 at 11:11 pm
From a link-up ad. at the time repeated ad.nauseum. in every UK cinema.
“CRAZE is a voodoo movie.
Jack Palance is the villain.
And he’s got his beady eye on lovely Julie Ege.”
I can’t remember if it was a milk commercial or not?
January 25, 2012 at 11:24 pm
Bizarre! I guess I can see Julie as a good milk spokesperson, but I don’t otherwise see why it’d be a helpful association…
January 26, 2012 at 12:33 am
January 26, 2012 at 2:07 am
Re points 2 and 7 I completely agree – Jenny Runacre and Dennis Price are always splendid to see.
January 26, 2012 at 9:19 am
JR even briefly makes The Mackintosh Man look as if it might be worthwhile. But in this one she gets no lines and nothing to do. Sure, it’s nice that she’s THERE, but she’s powerless to enliven.
February 1, 2012 at 4:25 am
I will be braced for forehead-stabbing at the next Filmhouse quiz.
I’m very disappointed by the lack of redeeming features. I assumed Freddie Jones would be one, for starters.
Speaking of obscure films by cinematographers-turned-directors, I’m sure there’s a few latter, barely-released Nic Roeg movies that might be worth a peek at some point. TWO DEATHS was okay, wasn’t it? And has anybody seen his Dennis Hopper/Liz Hurley/Diana Rigg/Michael Gambon SAMSON AND DELILAH?
February 1, 2012 at 1:13 pm
Some people like Two Deaths — maybe it’s more of a decent script and cast than a real Roeg work though. Samson looked dull, rather than camp, at least the few minutes I saw, but I imagine la Hurley provides some kind of ghastly entertainment.
The redeeming feature of Son of Dracula is the interesting new ways it finds to be bad…