“A passport to Hell is not issued on generalities.”

Laird Cregar utters that immortal line in Ernst Lubitsch’s HEAVEN CAN WAIT. It’s now my new number one principle of screenwriting. Loosely translated, it means, Be Specific. Since I’m a fan of the concept of le mot juste, this is an idea I gravitate to anyway — searching for the perfect expression of the idea, however imperfect the idea may be (we won’t even be able to judge until we see it perfectly expressed)…

In more practical terms, the camera is a very specific thing, so the screenplay has to be equally crisp. A couple of examples from student scripts I’ve been reading: one opened in a police station, where a bunch of drunk kids have been rounded up. The script says that some of them are throwing up, some crying, some arguing. I decreed that the writer had to decide exactly how many were doing each activity. Because it’s unlikely that more than one would be vomiting at any given moment… And it seemed worthwhile nailing it down so that the script was an accurate plan of what we would see and hear in the finished film, or at least of what would be enacted on the set on the day of filming.

In another script, an item in a catalogue was described as being expensive, with a lot of zeros in the price. Again, I objected, saying that the camera would be unlikely to show just a row of zeros, it was more likely to show the item with a full price under it, for maximum clarity, and so I suggested that, although the line was amusing, it was no help to the production designer who would have to obtain a catalogue image with a specific price.

The need for exactitude goes the other way — sometimes, adding an unnecessary word or detail can cause confusion. When I scripted a short called BURKE AND HARE: THE MUSICAL, I included the line “They put the body in a large tea chest.” Arriving on set, I found a specially-constructed box large enough to contain two large adults. I think the production designer had thought, “Right, a large box must mean a box bigger than necessary for the job.” Now the crew had to lug this thing around all over Edinburgh, bruising their fingers squeezing it through doorways. In reality, the word “big” had just been added to try and make the sentence sound more precise…

10 Responses to ““A passport to Hell is not issued on generalities.””

  1. Nobody expects the film school script inquisition! My weapon is crispness. Crispness and a fanatical devotion to detail”…

    Oh, well. It’s the best I can do first thing in the morning. BTW it does make perfect sense. Slovenly thought, slovenly script.

  2. Great points. Also, I’d add that the smaller the budget, the greater the need for exactness in the script, for obvious reasons.

  3. Absolutely, waste comes in the minute you fail to calculate exactly what you need to create the desired illusion — which happens any time you’re not precise about what the desired illusion IS.

    Big budget films embrace a certain amount of waste because it protects against mistakes: you build the entire set even though you’re quite sure you won’t need it, because what if you’re wrong? On small/no-budget movies, you simply have to be confident that you’re not wrong.

    Mario Bava was amazed at how the Americans would shoot something 20 times. “In Italy, if it doesn’t work the first time, you’re an asshole. That’s how it is in this business, you’re either God the Father or an asshole.”

  4. Poor Laird Creagar. He was borderline morbidly obese, instituted a crash diet, lost the weight and DIED before seeing his greatest performance : Hangover Square

  5. Excellent points, but in this context wouldn’t it be more accurate to call it Samson Raphaelson’s HEAVEN CAN WAIT? Great still though.

  6. Cregar also went on suspension to try and get out of doing Hangover Square, once he realized they weren’t going to be faithful to the book. He would have been even more magnificent in an accurate adaptation of Patrick Hamilton (although such a film wouldn’t have given Bernard Herrmann the opportunity to go quite so nuts).

    Rob, you have a good point. Worth remembering that Lubitsch was heavily involved in the scripts for all his films, but the line in its final is undoubtedly Raphaelson’s.

  7. Christopher Says:

    I took a playwriting course in college and was taught the Pyramid..or Oil Well method of fleshing out the plot..in which you draw a Pyramid shape and at the very tip you write your ending(know your ending in advance)and on either side of the thing going down,you write events that happen that led to the ending at the top…I remember this working pretty good.

  8. For me, the scariest Laird Cregar moment comes in I WAKE UP SCREAMING. Victor Mature imagines Laird (a corrupt cop) seated at his bedside, staring at him with a menacing (and lustful) smirk. That scene still gives me goosebumps.

  9. Christopher, I must try that. It does seem to be the case that stories tend to narrow towards a point where everything is either simplified out of existence, or converges at a point of climax.

    David, yes! The moment when Big Victor SHOULD wake up screaming, but doesn’t. Presumably he’s made of sterner stuff than his titles.

  10. Christopher Says:

    So many movies I’ve seen of late leave me gasping at the end..”wait!..thats it?!?”

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started