Only Joking
Michael Winner’s THE JOKERS may be his best film — you can see the whole thing on YouTube and judge for yourself. And in fact Winner’s rep might be higher than it is (in the UK he’s known mainly as a restaurant critic and as presenter of commercials for car insurance) if a few of his 60s films — I’LL NEVER FORGET WHATSISNAME and this one especially — were more regularly screened.
Edinburgh Film Festival comes to the rescue with a season of near-forgotten British classics from the post-new-wave era, boldly opening with Winner’s 1967 crime romp.
To be sure, the movie is probably one of the more visually ugly films shot in swinging London — many of Winner’s visual tricks are rather random, and both the photography and the dolly birds are slightly sub-par (milky, overexposed night scenes and bad skin, respectively), but the thing has a terrific pace and stars Oliver Reed and Michael Crawford are obviously under strict instructions to enjoy themselves hugely at all times. Surrounding them is a cut-price plethora of trusty character players, including but not limited to Edward Fox, Michael Hordern, Harry Andrews, Brian Wilde, Frank Finlay… the list goes on.
TV comedy legends Dick Clement and Ian La Frenais contribute a nifty script in which rich kids Reed and Crawford abduct the Crown Jewels from the Tower of London for a lark, and things take a surprisingly dark turn in the second half. Crawford does some of his usual schtick but manages to turn it a bit psychopathic in places, and Reed is just scary, the more so when he’s being ebullient and jolly. For a film by sitcom scribes, there aren’t many brilliant lines, but the situations are all good, and when Reed’s char-lady expresses histrionic grief at the nation’s loss, his insincere condolences cracked me up: “Yes, well, it’s not the money, is it, it’s the sentimental value.”
June 18, 2010 at 3:09 pm
It seems as if Winner was thinking of —
June 18, 2010 at 3:10 pm
Peersonally I like Michael Crawford best here —
June 18, 2010 at 6:19 pm
Crawford is a strange guy, seemingly. The British don’t appreciate him because they find his sitcom Some Mothers Do ‘Ave ‘Em embarrassing. But for a few years he was like the British Jackie Chan, doing his own spectacular stunts with aplomb.
June 18, 2010 at 7:29 pm
He is also superb here —
June 18, 2010 at 9:28 pm
Ronald Neame R.I.P.
A lovely man.
June 18, 2010 at 9:58 pm
More on Mr. Neame.
His mother, Ivy Close, starred in Abel Gance’s La Roue
June 19, 2010 at 12:22 am
THAT I did not know. RIP indeed. A long and splendid life. An invaluable link to film history has been severed.
June 19, 2010 at 12:24 am
June 19, 2010 at 2:37 am
I watched it on YouTube and found it pretty good for the genre. Couldn’t tell much about it visually (YouTube has such awful video resolution that except for the odd film rarity I usually just listen to music and skip the films). Winner sure liked the wide-angle lens a lot in some of the scenes, a bit too much for me. Saw a lot of British character actors I recognized.
Most American caper films aren’t half this smart (the good ones are smart, but I’ve seen many mediocre and outright bad ones – comes with having a guilty pleasure for the genre, like with the spy film). Reed’s wonderful, he darkens even the light moments, and when he smiles or laughs I wonder if it’s really for the banal reason shown or something more sinister. Crawford begins as something of a childish twit, but shows he’s a lot smarter and meaner than he appears at the beginning. As far as his career, all I can say is huh? Brits don’t appreciate him due to his sitcom (some of the physical gags are very funny, like the ep when he’s out of control on his motorbike), yet Benny Hill got exported here. Okay, maybe that’s a sign of British contempt for America, but I hardly find Crawford’s show anything really embarrassing. I’ve only seen five episodes or thereabouts, so maybe I’m not the best judge.
June 19, 2010 at 11:03 am
Oh, nobody speaks up for Benny Hill here either. I’m not a huge fan, but it’s interesting how he could be so successful and yet so despised. They cancelled his show when it was still massively popular, because they were so embarrassed about it.
I think slapstick has a bad name here, maybe. Mr Bean and Some Mothers aren’t Keaton, but the level of opprobrium they attract from critics is surprising. Again, they’re not my thing, but there’s something going on when the reviews are so angry.
June 19, 2010 at 3:35 pm
How can you be simultaneously embarrassing and massively popular? Hill had topless women, which to my hormone-ravaged mind made his show watchable (other than Hill’s show, any nudity on American TV back then only happened when a local station accidentally ran the original version of a R-rated theatrical film). Americans have that same embarrassment about TV shows, but it’s usually after the show’s run is over. The knives come out at the post-mortem, but it’s funny to see someone twist themselves in knots defending Lost, Buffy The Vampire Slayer, or (most indefensibly) CSI.
June 19, 2010 at 5:57 pm
Buffy -love NEVER dies!
June 19, 2010 at 6:04 pm
June 19, 2010 at 6:11 pm
British TV is absolutely a middle-class industry, and Hill’s appeal was largely working-class. He began his career when there was a somewhat patronizing but very real desire to give the “great unwashed” the kind of light entertainment they enjoyed. Hill lasted so long that he lived to see TV execs who would rather NOT have millions of viewers for a show like his.
June 19, 2010 at 8:55 pm
Benny Hill was extremely popular in the US,especially in the southern states(anything from the UK ,especially Ireland and Scotland)is embraced here down south….I remember Hal Roach nearing his 100th birthday ,was asked if there were any comedians he admired currently,and he mentioned Benny Hill.
June 19, 2010 at 9:35 pm
Makes sense. I actually like a lot of Hill’s more verbal sketches.
June 19, 2010 at 10:27 pm
Roach did mention the slapstick in regards to Hill of course,still, I thought a fresh reply ,wasn’t expecting Benny Hill!..still looking for guys that can come up with a good GAG..Hill and Mr. Bean aren’t always right up there,but I admire comics that will still try silence and visuals in this age..
June 19, 2010 at 10:43 pm
Like me?
Looking forward to seeing the new Suleiman for that very reason.
June 20, 2010 at 12:00 am
I admire comics that try visual humor. Problem with Benny Hill was that he’d miss with his gags (visual and verbal) as often as he hit, and his misses could be painful. Really painful. I mean Laugh-In painful (if you’ve seen the bad parts of that show, you’d know what I mean). That, and the interminable use of “Yakkety Sax” made some of it really hard to sit through, even for a teenager waiting for some naked breasts. And Hill was on early in the A.M. here.
June 20, 2010 at 12:40 am
Yeah, “uneven” is really the word. Hill died within a day of Frankie Howerd, a fellow smut-meister with an amazing style of delivery. Of the two, I have more affection by far for Howerd’s bizarre persona.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8SI5gdPZcU
June 20, 2010 at 2:45 am
I love Frankie Howerd, he always seemed to be ready to go lunatic at any moment. Amazing smut-meister, eh? Never knew that, he didn’t get imported much. What was it with weird actors and the Carry On films? I admit I couldn’t imagine the films without those broad, unique acting styles. If there wasn’t a Frankie Howerd or a Kenneth Williams about, Carry Ons might get a trifle dull.
June 20, 2010 at 10:05 am
Well yes, there’s no filmmaking to compensate for the absence of charismatic leads, so they really need them. The cast all worked for straight salaries, by the way, nobody ever got profit points except the producer.