The Dream Detective
The top movie opens like whorling ink and oil and blood in a madman’s plughole. The lower movie opens like a five-dimensional bezoar viewed through a kaleidoscope — abstract clouds of translucent hair that seem to pass through us as we delve deeper. After that opening title though, they are the same.

Behold! The Floating Head of Death in NIGHTMARE and FEAR IN THE NIGHT.
Maxwell Shane liked Cornell Woolrich’s story Nightmare so much, he made it twice, first as FEAR IN THE NIGHT, which was DeForest Kelley’s first feature (and seeing the very fine performance of the Dr. McCoy guy in JJ Abrams’ STAR TREK reboot reminded me how warmly I feel towards DFK), in 1947, and again in 1956 as NIGHTMARE, with Kevin McCarthy in the lead but with Edward G Robinson accorded senior billing, as is only right.
In fact, it seems Robinson, who had previously starred in a real Woolrich classic, NIGHT HAS A THOUSAND EYES (not very faithful to the source novel, but very good), made this film mainly to clear his name after he’d had some trouble with HUAC. The Z-list producers, William Pine and William Thomas (known in the trade as “the Dollar Bills”) seem to have had some power to rehabilitate stars who were under a cloud: if you worked for them, you were judged OK.
According to unreferenced internet sources, Maxwell Shane himself was a writer for Black Mask magazine, linking him to the Woolrich tradition of pulp-noir writing, and he later worked on Boris Karloff’s Thriller show, where the Woolrich story Guillotine was adapted for TV.
Incidentally, in Woolrich’s 1947 story A Night in Barcelona, the hero is called Maxwell Jones, and he’s a jazz musician, like the hero of NIGHTMARE, although unlike the hero of the 1947 FEAR IN THE NIGHT. Make of that what you will. And Woolrich reused the name, according to CW authority Francis M Nevins, in his last completed novel, Death is My Dancing Partner.
It begins — with a nightmare! Kevin McCarthy, the chin who walks like a man, sees himself in a mirrored room, stabbing a man with an ice-pick/awl, and stashing the body in a closet. “I felt as if my brain was in handcuffs,” he narrates, absurdly. During the struggle, he tears off one of the man’s jacket buttons, and after hiding the cadaver he pockets the key. And when he wakes up — you guessed it, he has the button and key on him. Also bruises and bloodstains.
This, then, is the mystery. McCarthy, sweating and jutting his jaw, is convinced the murder was real, but he doesn’t consciously remember it, and he doesn’t, so far as he knows, know the murdered man.
There’s a faint echo of this scenario in MINORITY REPORT, Spielberg’s “science fiction film noir“, which makes me ponder the death of noir and the limitations of a lot of neo-noir. I have a suspicion that noir died as a result of creeping self-consciousness, and that the very act of naming the genre was a nail in it’s coffin. But I also think that noir succeeded in its heyday because the filmmakers were sincere about the paranoia and fear that fueled the stories they told, and nobody was more sincere than Woolrich, who lived the life of loneliness and alcoholism. It’s hard to think of a sensibility less noirish than Spielberg’s, isn’t it? So in his movie, a man is really driven to the brink of murdering somebody he doesn’t know, and he’s all set to do it, as predicted by a psychic (Philip K Dick’s original story is very Woolrichian — both are ham-and-eggs pulp writers with weird imaginations), but then Spielberg wusses out and needs an additional forty-five minutes of screen time to come up with a happy ending in which malevolent fate is replaced by a nonsensical bad guy with a foreign accent, played by a guy who played lots of Nazis and the Emperor Ming.
Meanwhile, Kevin McCarthy ditches his girlfriend, a big-voiced jazz singer (Connie Russell, impressively full-throated) and visits his convenient cop brother-in-law, Eddie G. Who doesn’t believe him, until a family picnic is interrupted by a thunderstorm and McCarthy leads Robinson to the house he dreamed about, the house with the mirrored room. (The room also appears in Shane’s FEAR IN THE NIGHT, which is shot-for-shot near-identical to this one, save for a lower budget and no jazz subplot. FITN appeared the same year as Welles’ mirror-magic-show THE LADY FROM SHANGHAI.)
Now we learn there’s been a real murder in this house and things are not looking good for Kevin. The only real clue comes in the reading material favoured by the unseen householder ~
Suspicious!
Do you sense a hypnosis plot lurking in the wings? Do you suspect that the old adage about hypnosis being useless to make somebody act out of character was possibly not extant at the time of this movie? How right you are!
Along the way we get further nice ideas like McCarthy searching for the haunting, sleazy and scary tune he heard floating through his dream, quizzing his jazz cohorts in a dutch-tilted montage sequence to find out if anybody can Name That Tune. And we get a few nice ceiling fans and shadow shots.
As long as I’m kicking MINORITY REPORT for its feelgood finale, I should really be consistent and smack NIGHTMARE for the cheery family-values-and-jazz coda that wraps things up into a neat bundle at the end. There were ample opportunities to kill or permanently dement McCarthy along the way. But the conclusion is put over with some enthusiasm and good spirits, and it’s pretty economical, and the song is nice. This is from late in the noir cycle, so one doesn’t expect too much (TOUCH OF EVIL and KISS ME DEADLY notwithstanding), but the movie is a snappy, happy little opus with a great crime jazz score, good New Orleans locations, and a few very pleasing visuals. Here’s a moment where Kevin thinks he sees a vision from his dream ~
Gotta love that split mirror image. In fact, the whole scene is part of the padding inserted to blow up the B-movie original to a beefier 1 hr 28 mins. McCarthy picks up the girl and goes home with her, and by way of Big Easy atmos there’s a black female voice singing blues in the night, and it really is atmospheric and kind of eerie, especially because the whole thing has nothing to do with the plot ~
“My closet’s full of men’s clothes / And no man to put ’em on / Gonna find a man to love me / Before this day is gone.”
NB: DREAM DETECTIVE is the title of a film by Shinya Tsukamoto. I like his work, but that title is so evocative for me I almost don’t want to see it. How can the film be better than the title and the thoughts it conjures?
NB2: Francis M Nevins is right to say that FEAR IN THE NIGHT is the superior version. Now that I’ve watched it all, I can say that Paul Kelly in the Edward G Robinson role makes the difference — he’s always an alarming and unpredictable presence, c.f. that terrifying scene in CROSSFIRE…








April 15, 2010 at 11:55 am
MINORITY REPORT has a direct reference to DARK PASSAGE, the eye-replacement surgery directly cites the plastic surgery sequences of that marvellous fever-dream of a film. And one scene shows House of Bamboo. I rather like the Spielberg and don’t see the happy ending as wussed out as much as it confronts the oedipal relationship between Sydow and Cruise.
That said I agree with you regarding “neo-noir”(all those fake looking period dressings which I hate on general principle). The only film that I like in that kind is of course CHINATOWN, which is extremely critical of the PI mythos, Wim Wenders’ ”HAMMETT”(can we imagine a ”WOOLRICH”?) which is about the myth of films noir as created, as imagined and lived and felt by a real-life private investigator turned author whose works supplied a key influence to Things to Come and of course you have Altman’s ”THE LONG GOODBYE”.
April 15, 2010 at 1:48 pm
I recently saw a ferris wheel half dismantled and wanted to take a photo of it to talk about Dashiell Hammett, whose first job as detective was to trace a stolen ferris wheel. When I went back with my camera, the thing had gone.
Hammett, being a real detective, was more conducive to fictionalization than Woolrich, who could only plausibly get involved in a Rear Window kind of domestic/neighbourhood mystery. But it would be interesting to try and make such a morbidly unhappy creature appeal to an audience.
Martha is kind of a neo-noir, in a very odd way: all the characters wear forties costume (or a seventies approximation), but there’s no pretense to it being a period film.
The ending of Minority Report did two things I disliked (apart from coming 45 minutes after the climax) — it had Sydow choose to destroy the system he’d done everything to protect, for no character-based reason, and it sold the conclusion as a totally happy ending, avoiding the obvious proviso, “…and people could go happily back to murdering each other again.”
I enjoyed seeing Robert Ryan on the screen in the background though.
April 15, 2010 at 2:23 pm
The best thing in Minority Report is the great Lois Smith.
And speaking of acting greats here’s Anna Karina.
April 15, 2010 at 3:17 pm
NIGHTMARE and FEAR IN THE NIGHT are also the titles of Hammer thrillers.
April 15, 2010 at 3:25 pm
Think we’ll see echoes of these films in Nolan’s new dream-dweller movie Inception? The lucid dreaming movie is becoming a very common trope, a good excuse for directors with unlimited resources to exercise their visual imaginations.
April 15, 2010 at 3:28 pm
Shadows of fans and a jazz-based maguffin… that all sounds very Angel Heart.
My HUGE beef with the end of Minority Report – which I’m surprised so few other people pick up on – is that Tom Cruise is broken out of futureprison by his wife pointing a gun at the janitor! You’d think having gone to all that trouble to CATCH criminals this future distopia would have put a bit more thought into their actual incarceration, and not just kept them in a room looked after by some bloke. Fools.
April 15, 2010 at 3:57 pm
Great AK piece, David!
Minority Report is full of plausibility issues, which I can overlook more easily than the selling out of its premise and the betrayal of noir spirit.
Nolan’s work has annoyed me — his version of Insomnia stinks on ice — but I enjoyed The Prestige and his second bloated Batman was an improvement on his first bloated Batman. Inception looks kind of fun!
Shame about the title…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSyQ3K0xnYg&feature=related
April 15, 2010 at 5:58 pm
Looks like a gigantic Raul Ruiz movie.
April 15, 2010 at 8:13 pm
> It seems that Robinson […]
> made this film mainly to clear
> his name after he’d had some
> trouble with HUAC
I seem to remember reading, in Robinson’s autobiography, that Robinson’s name was “cleared” when DeMille decided that he wanted to used Robinson for “The Ten Commandments” — the notion being that if someone as right-wing as DeMille approved you it was as good as a Papal imprimatur.
Of course, IMDb lists “Nightmare” as coming after “The Ten Commandments,” but … they *were* both 1956.
> “I felt my brain was in handcuffs”
Rather like William Blake’s “mid-forged manacles.” In this context, even the verse it comes from, “London,” seems Woolrich-ian:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjtDYa-HZzI
April 15, 2010 at 9:59 pm
I love the idea of connecting Woolrich to Blake!
A pity Night Has a Thousand Eyes hinges on a lion rather than a tyger.
April 16, 2010 at 1:53 am
To Arthur S, et al. – I daresay there have been quite a few terrific noirs since the so-called “classic period.” In addition to the ones you mentioned, there’s POINT BLANK, LE SAMOURAI, TAXI DRIVER, OBSESSION (De Palma), CAPE FEAR (Scorsese), L.A. CONFIDENTIAL, PULP FICTION, MYSTIC RIVER, THE DRIVER (a neglected film by Walter Hill), Nolan’s MEMENTO, Lynch’s BLUE VELVET, LOST HIGHWAY, and MULHOLLAND DR., THE BOSTON STRANGLER, the sci-fi noirs of Fleischer (SOYLENT GREEN) and Scott (BLADE RUNNER) … those are just a few off the top of my head.
One of the many problems with MINORITY REPORT was that in attempting to make a sci-fi noir, Spielberg chose the wrong model – he says he looked at THE MALTESE FALCON, which isn’t all that noir to begin with, when he should have been looking at stuff like PHANTOM LADY, DETOUR, and THE KILLERS. I agree that the whole last 45 minutes of MINORITY REPORT was a huge problem (it should have been jetissoned in toto). Also, the ugly design.
A lot of Phillip K. Dick reads like noir. FLOW MY TEARS THE POLICEMAN SAID could make a great film noir.
April 16, 2010 at 5:17 am
To Jerry,
Well I was referring more to period dressing films noir like ”The Black Dahlia” and the like and generally amongst American films because Melville seems in another ballpark. Among modern films noir, I love ”The Long Goodbye”(whose screenplay is by Leigh Brackett herself). TAXI DRIVER strikes me as a film far removed from noir in any sense as does ”The Boston Strangler”. The closest Scorsese has come to film noir is ”The Departed” but more the grungy B-policiers in the tradition of ”The Big Combo, Underworld USA” and ”The Rise and Fall of Legs Diamond”.
Like Chris Fujiwara, I feel that the whole noir fetish in cinephilia is getting uninteresting with any film that’s serious or grim in tone and features criminals is tagged noir. As for science-fiction noir, I’ll violate my own nationality-themed rules and state that the genre was born and exhausted with ”Alphaville”.
I’m not saying Minority Report is a perfect film or a masterpiece but it’s still far more fun than most future-set films, despite Tom Cruise and the whole seriousness of it but then I never took it as a sci-fi noir. Just as a thriller with the usual family trauma that drives his films.
April 16, 2010 at 6:34 am
@ Arthur – I think you can trace the sci-fi noir subgenre at least as far back as Siegel’s INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS, a classic embodiment of noir’s paranoia and dread, and the subgenre reached a pre-ALPHAVILLE peak with the work of directors like John Brahm and Gerd Oswald on TV’s THE OUTER LIMITS. My views on noir and neo-noir are developed at greater length here: http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/54/noirgolden.php
@ David – If self-consciousness is what makes a noir “neo,” then THE LADY FROM SHANGHAI, KISS ME DEADLY, and THE KILLING are seminal “neo-noirs” due to the extreme self-consciousness with which their directors, Welles, Aldrich and Kubrick, employed noir conventions. Welles, one of film’s greatest parodists, was pastiching a set of tropes that at the time LADY FROM SHANGHAI was made hadn’t even yet been named.
April 16, 2010 at 11:47 am
Is it my imagination or does Menzies’ red-baiting The Whip Hand have mild sci-fi elements? One could stretch a point and include Losey’s The Damned also. And certainly Kiss Me Deadly predates Alphaville and can be said to include science-fictional aspects.
But arguing about what does and doesn’t fit a genre is of limited value. Although it can be interesting to look at a pure noir and find areas where it departs from genre norms — that has more to do with the creative process.
Those “proto-neo-noirs” are a different thing from the 70s Farewell My Lovely, though, since they partake of the period of classic noir, so they can be self-AWARE without being archly self-conscious. They also work in a register natural to the filmmakers — Kubrick used practical light sources throughout his career, Aldrich always favoured gritty material viewed in an unsentimental way, Welles was doing noir visuals back in Kane. It’s no stretch for the filmmakers to step into the noir world, they don’t need to distort their natural style, and they’re working within modern-for-the-time stylistic norms (just about), with absolutely no sense of nostalgia, Maybe nostalgia, and not self-consciousness, is the true killer, since true noir writers and filmmakers were never moved by it.
April 16, 2010 at 7:29 pm
I’ve always had a problem with definitions of noir that are overly restrictive, e.g., the private eye paradigm (which was a popular conception of noir for a while) when so many of the best noirs have nothing to do with private eyes. I’m glad you’re emphasizing Woolrich this week as a true paradigm of the genre – if genre it is.
Menzies’ THE WHIP HAND does have mild sci-fi elements (the bad guys are experimenting with bacteriological warfare) and its noir elements are also comparatively mild. Much better and stronger from both a sci-fi and a noir perspective, of course, is his INVADERS FROM MARS. And I’d agree that Losey’s THE DAMNED is damned near a masterpiece of sci-fi noir. And KISS ME DEADLY, too, when seen that way.
“Maybe nostalgia, and not self-consciousness, is the true killer.” BINGO! Yes, that’s exactly what bothers me about a lot of so-called neo-noirs. Let’s not blame self-consciousness/awareness which in the case of Welles, Aldrich, Kubrick, and others (e.g., the French New Wave) produced a lot of swell films. On the other hand, I get turned off by most of the “nostalgic” neo-noirs with the very notable exceptions of CHINATOWN and L.A. CONFIDENTIAL.