Out of Mind

Keith Carradine’s hair is only one of many reason’s to enjoy TROUBLE IN MIND. Believe it or not, it’s not even one of the major reasons. The film is that good. I mean, there the hair is, hovering above his head like an angry deity, and yet in my review of the 1985 indie sleeper over at The Daily Notebook, this edition of the column known as The Forgotten, I barely even mention the hair. So that must be quite a film, right?

11 Responses to “Out of Mind”

  1. david wingrove Says:

    Does Marianne actually appear in the film, or does she just sing on the soundtrack? She’s one of a very few people on earth who are equally pleasant to look and to listen to…just so long as she doesn’t try to ACT!!

  2. She doesn’t appear, but there’s no “just” about it — the song helps bind the film together.

  3. What are you talking about Mr. Wingrove? She was marvelous in Patrice Chereau’s Intimacy.

  4. I love how Keith Carradine’s hair evolves over the course of the movie, and it’s very appropriate that the rain in Rain City has the final say on Keith’s hair. Great, great movie. Plays like a dream.

  5. You said it! The final, redemptive makeover.

    It struck me on re-viewing that the sound mix is particularly superb, with the train station noises that blend through the song in the opening titles, the interplay between saxophone and prison gates, all contributing to that jazzy melancholy beauty…

  6. Rudolph is great on music, though a little overly fond of Mark Isham’s nu-age noodling.

  7. david wingrove Says:

    While I’m normally a fan of both Marianne and Patrice Chereau, I found INTIMACY to be a pointless, ugly and profoundly depressing film. Its graphic but totally unerotic ‘love’ scenes actually put me off sex for a week.

    Marianne was probably the best thing in it, as she is in most of her films, but in this case that’s not saying much!

  8. Chereau seemed to have acquired the British disease, as seen in such explicit yet disheartening movies as 9 Songs, whereby the filmmaker expects praise for being “brave” by serving up graphic but repulsive sex scenes. Chereau is someone whose work I usually like, but the Kureishi connection was enough to put me off this one.

    Stephen Norrington makes loud, bad films, but I felt very much on his side when he said, “We are the generation that hates London Kills Me.”

  9. david wingrove Says:

    Strange that Kureishi’s films are so bleak, as he can be a lively and amusing prose writer. His debut novel THE BUDDDHA OF SUBURBIA is an unofficial autobiography for anyone who’s lived ‘on the edge’ in London.

  10. He tries to get some vivacity in sometimes, but I think he just doesn’t have the cinematic sense to pull it off. Stephen Frears certainly has an understanding of cinema, but his inclination is to the small-scale and realist and so he doesn’t provide an interesting new flavour to the mix, as far as I’m concerned.

    Many disagree, of course.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 127 other followers