Purple October

“In THE DEVIL AND THE DEEP (1932), Paramount Pictures place Charles Laughton in charge of a submarine. It sinks.”

I tweeted this, and the Self-Styled Siren said she was a bad Laughton fan for laughing. Not at all! To admire Laughton’s craft and peerless imagination is not the same as to believe that the kind of character he plays would excel in a position of command. Look at Captain Bligh. In the role of “the Commander” in this movie, he’s been set up to fail, for the first half establishes him as a lunatic in the throes of psychotic jealousy, trashing Cary Grant’s career on the mere suspicion that he’s overly fond of Mrs Commander (Talullah Bankhead). So Mr Grant is out of the picture, and Gary Cooper comes into it, which is even worse news for marital harmony, as you might expect.

All of this plays out in Paramount North Africa, before we decamp to the sub, making the movie a sort of MOROCCO/HUNT FOR RED OCTOBER mash-up. In Part One we get a beautiful lunar oasis tryst, whirling dervishes and tenacious salesmen. In Part Two we get a collision, bursting bulkheads, flooding compartments, and Laughton’s descent into final madness even as his sub descends to the ocean floor, as fatally compromised as his marriage.

Bankhead plays the virtuous wife driven into adultery by hubbie’s paranoia with dignity and just enough melodrama. Grant is still in awkward, stiff-necked mode. Coop pouts and purses his lips a lot. His performances come in two varieties: those with a mute running commentary from the writhing lips, and those without. Both are good, but I tend to prefer the more stationary lip approach. Anyway, Laughton is the whole show.

Faced with a cardboard lunatic to play, the Great Man breaths seething life into him through bold decisions — this jealous nut actually wants to be proved right, to catch his wife in flagrante, and when he does so he goes from tense to relaxed. Laughton wheels out his cherubic smirk. The terrible doubt is over (because if Mrs Commander is innocent, then that “brain specialist” was RIGHT) and now he can proceed to DESTROY THE WORLD. Actually, he can’t, because he doesn’t have a Doomsday Device to hand, but he can certainly crash his sub into an oncoming ship and send her to the bottom of the sea with all hands and feet.

It’s been suggested that suicides often cheer up once they’ve actually made the decision to do it — once that choice is made, there’s nothing more to worry about. Laughton either knew this or, quite probably, intuited it, so that his character becomes positively triumphant as he steers his men towards doom, and only sinks into a despond when any reasonable argument threatens the logic of his annihilation. In one such scene, the distressed Commander pulls on his face, gradually squishing his cheeks up and drawing them downwards until the whole fleshy construction resembles a wad of dough suspended from his eyelids. Don’t tell me Charles didn’t practice this in front of the mirror. For hours.

Marion Gering directs with zest, although his attempts at dramatic flourishes are mostly rendered redundant by Laughton’s stylistic exuberance — you really don’t need a giant ECU of the twitching eyes, not when you have a player as expressive as CL.

About these ads

26 Responses to “Purple October”

  1. Totally long to see Tallulah in one of her early films.

    Hollywood legend has it that she arrived from New York and had a grand tour of the studio. Then she turned to a studio underling and said…”Tell me dahling, how does one get laid in this dreadful place?!”

    Her film career was predictably short-lived.

  2. Obvioulsy she was speaking to the wrong underling.

  3. Wasn’t she drummed out of England for allegedly seducing an entire soccer team, or something?

    For my money, having watched The Cheat as well, Early Laughton beats Early Tallulah — his perf in White Woman is even more eccentric than here. (Heavy spoilers in this clip)

  4. Damned stupid underling.

  5. La Faustin Says:

    Poor Cary Grant seemed to go through his Paramount stint in a mood of incredulous disgust.

    No, he didn’t want to play second fiddle to Gary Cooper.

    No, he didn’t want to be Mae West’s love-slave.

    No, he really, really didn’t want to whip Jack La Rue.

  6. And yet, he GETS INTO IT.

    Starting to think LaRue is underrated, what with The Story of Temple Drake being another extraordinary piece of pre-code s&m.

  7. The ancient rhetoricians had a word for constructions like “Something that’s over your head got under my skin.” Though I hesitate to say what that word was.

  8. La Faustin Says:

    He’s a fascinating guy – Mae West’s first “tall dark and handsome” in DIAMOND LIL on Broadway, the original casting for Paul Muni’s sidekick in SCARFACE (replaced by George Raft), the unearthly sweet priest in Borzage’s FAREWELL TO ARMS, the gangster in GOLDEN BOY (the Joseph Calleia role) when the Group Theater triumphantly invaded the West End — and, apparently, endowed with the zestful PR instincts of a Lee Tracy character:

    “SAYS ACTOR STRUCK HER
    (New York Times, July 5, 1927)

    Woman, in Court Bruised, Accuses Jack La Rue, Who Pays $25 Fine.

    Jack La Rue, who plays a crook in “Crime,” a melodrama at the Times Square Theatre, appeared in West Side Court yesterday on a disorderly conduct charge made by Annette A’Leau, who said that she also acted in the play.

    The woman, who lives at 334 West Forty-fifth Street, attracted Patrolman Daniel Keogh of the West Forty-seventh Street Station early yesterday morning by her screams. Keogh ran to that address and saw La Rue strike her, he said. He arrested the actor after a scuffle. The woman testified that La Rue had hit her when he had discovered her speaking to an artist for whom she had once posed.

    La Rue denied striking Miss A’Leau. But as she appeared in court with her face bruised and her right eye discolored, Magistrate Earl A. Smith fined the actor $25.”

    One imagines the tabloids the next day: undraped art studies of Miss A’Leau in happier days, flash photography of Jack snarling defiance on the witness stand … One further imagines them blocking the scuffle with Patrolman Keogh and applying the greasepaint to Miss A.’s eye.

    If you don’t already have VIRTUE (1932), in which Jack La Rue plays Mayo Methot’s kept man and is very funny – actually, the whole film is a tangy little treat – could I offer it as a belated birthday present?

  9. How kind! I do have a copy of it lying around, about time I watched it. Maybe LaRue is a candidate for The Forgotten. He’s recently garnered fresh attention via the hysterical British gangster pic No Orchids for Miss Blandish.

  10. La Faustin Says:

    Whence the immortal lyric:

    “Sometimes I wish I could hurl a rock
    Into the pool that is yoooooooou …”

    It’s sort of like CORRIDOR OF MIRRORS with gangsters, isn’t it?

    You introduced me to La Rue with your terrific TEMPLE DRAKE post, and I’ll always be grateful.

  11. The Devil and The Deep may not be Charles’ better known or appreciated work, but I’ve grown as fond about it as I have of White Woman. Simon Callow is possibly right when he says that, compared with what was to come, his work here is “prentice work”, but it’s still quite nice to have him giving here your ticket’s worth and more: there’s something delicious about his deliriously mad commander… One would say he gets quite a kick out of the thought of being betrayed by his wife, and is disappointed by the actual thing happening.

    in spite of Tallulah’s hostility, and the ordeal of having to shoot all those sinking scenes in cold water (Charles had to drink whisky while alternate sets of navy uniforms were dried and ironed between takes… For hours on end), he actually found it a positive experience, among other things, for the smoking lessons from Gary Cooper.

    It may be my favourite submarine movie, a genre that has given such wonders as Opperation Petticoat and Yellow Submarine (which I also love to bits)

    “Don’t tell me Charles didn’t practice this in front of the mirror. For hours”
    If you believe the Lanchester-Higham version of his life and deeds, he did.

    Still, they too often write Laughton as if he were an emo teen, so I take their version with a pack of salt. I understand (someone correct me if I’m wrong here), but at the time Higham wrote his Lanchester-backed laughton biography, he was himself a closeted gay… Was he channeling feelings about himself, rather than writing objectively about Laughton?

    Incidentally, Elsa wrote that, in her pre-marital years, she and Tallullah had been very good friends in London, only to find, a bit shocked, that she was so nasty to Charles when they worked together… I may be reading too much between lines but it sounds as if Tallullah resented a rival.

  12. Could well be! There are actors who are very good, and you’d feel privileged to be in a scene with them, feeling that their strength would rub off and make you emerge all the better. Laughton’s not really like that, is her? It’s not selfishness or gratuitous scene-grabbing, but he’s the only one you can look at, usually. Tallulah may have sensed this.

    Although — in something like This Land is Mine! he’s beautifully integrated and the whole cast shines. Having Renoir around makes a difference!

    Biographers do often project onto their subjects a good deal, which makes me curious about those who wind up hating the people they write about…

  13. I have to say that I think that Miss Bankhead is really good in this film, and I think that is a pity that she didn’t make more films, altough she happens to be memorable onscreen, as in Lifeboat.

    I think that the trouble of some directors with CL may have been that they were scared of him, but you’re right that good director chemistry (or accompliceship)could improve results.

  14. Laughton’s methods were so unique (although the method did lead to comparable approaches later) that I think Hitchcock and Sternberg and Kanin just thought he was kind of mad. Those who indulged him got better results than those who withdrew, like Sternberg, but the best approach of all was to enter into the spirit of it, as Renoir obviously did.

    I even like Tallulah in Fanatic (AKA Die! Die! My Darling) although she’s not always in control there.

  15. This post reminds me of that funny moment in the Spartacus commentary where Peter Ustinov suggests that Laughton would be unsuitable for any maritime film more modern than the Bounty by doing an impression of him feebly shouting “Fire the torpedos!”

  16. Jordan Benedict Says:

    Tallulah Bankhead, virtuous?! Not in her lifetime on stage or screen. Do you know the story about Chico Marx and Tallulah?
    They met at a party one evening. Chico (so-called because he couldn’t resist a beautiful chic) spots Tallulah across a crowded room. The host of the party begged him to behave himself. “You no gotta worry about me, boss,” he said, “She’s a classy looker.”
    So Chico crosses the room and plants himself in front of her.
    “I’m Chico Marx.” She gives him a glance and says, “Call me Tallulah.” They stare at each other for a moment. Chico says,
    “I’d like to f**k you.” Without missing a beat, Tallulah replied in her famous husky voice: “And so you shall, you dear oldfashioned boy!”

  17. I guess there are actors that eat up scenery, but Laughton’s process was self devouring

  18. Jordan Benedict Says:

    Here’s another Tallulah anecdote that happened during the filming of LIFEBOAT. Hitchcock wanted a low angle shot of the actress for a scene. The cameraman set it up, then sat back, turned to the director and said sotto voce: “She’s not wearing any underwear.” Hitchcock replied, “Well, I’m not sure if that’s a problem for wardrobe, makeup or hairdressing.”

  19. Jordan Benedict Says:

    Oops, pardon my typo. Hitchcock’s reply to the cameraman should read: “Well, I’m not sure if that’s a problem for wardrobe, makeup or hairdressing.”

  20. Jordan, sorry, I tried to correct that typo in your comment, then messed it up and had to reconstruct from memory. Sorry if I got it wrong, but the anecdote comes across at least.

    Laughton’s method’s obviously caused him some difficulty and pain, but that may be because he cared so much, rather than any flaw in his approach. Sternberg felt that his good scenes made up for the weaker ones, but Laughton didn’t want to have any weak scenes at all — insufficiently rigorous quality control is probably what made him lose faith in his director. And yes, we know Sternberg was a hard taskmaster, but obviously not about the things Laughton cared about most.

  21. OK, one last Tallulah story and then I promise to stop…

    Tallulah and her drinking buddy Dorothy Parker arrive (somewhat the worse for wear) at a cocktail party in New York.

    Tallulah: Oh look, it’s Montgomery Clift!
    Dorothy: Isn’t he a c***sucker?
    Tallulah: I wouldn’t know, dear. He’s never sucked mine!

    A deathly hush descends on the room. Our two ladies vanish into the night – in search of new victims.

  22. Heh.

    I like all that stuff like “They used to photograph Shirley temple through a gauze. With me they should use a lead screen.”

  23. ADVISE AND CONSENT and THE OLD DARK HOUSE seem to be the best examples of Laughton as an ensemble player. And in SPARTACUS, Ustinov actually steals scenes from him.

  24. Spartacus, AKA War of the Colossal Acting Styles. I think This Land is Mine! has to stand near the pinnacle, even though he’s in the lead. All Renoirs play like ensemble films. I Claudius would have been fascinating because Sternberg was surrounding him with really broadly drawn types. In the midst of that, Laughton would have been a broadly-drawn specific human figure. The surviving scenes suggest it could have worked nicely.

  25. “All Renoirs play like ensemble films.” True! And I neglected to mention RUGGLES OF RED GAP (by Renoir’s favorite American director, Leo McCarey) in which Laughton fits quite well into an eccentric ensemble.

  26. [...] was smoothly directed by Marion Gering, of DEVIL AND THE DEEP BLUE SEA and 24 HOURS fame. In place of Capra, I might actually suggest everybody spends the next ten years [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 235 other followers

%d bloggers like this: