Intertitle of the Week: War is Heck

The Kaiser criticises his staff for neglecting a briefing in SHOULDER ARMS.
I’m reading Glen David Gold’s Sunnyside as slowly as possible to prolong the pleasure, and watching along with the book — viewing the Chaplin films dealt with in the text as they come up. I’m not sure if there are going to be more than two, but I suspect so: the titular SUNNYSIDE would seem a likely candidate, after all.
SHOULDER ARMS is the film Chaplin’s friends advised him not to make. A comedy about WWI? From a director/star who had been publicly criticized for his failure to enlist? Gold charts the process by which Chaplin managed to tiptoe around the various land-mines littering the no-man’s land in his artistic path. Casting the German enemy as Keystone Kops pus things on a fantastical footing, and showing the travails of the working soldier in a sympathetic light, Chaplin made a film which, while not of his highest standard, must have offered cathartic relief to audiences at the time. And a few bits are really good, notably the gags in the flooded trench.
This is where Chaplin goes to sleep, underwater, breathing through a gramophone horn, and this is where I expected to see him wake up, after the extended fantasy sequence that sees him disguised as a Tolkein ent, meeting Edna Purviance (who manages to seem French just by skilled use of body language) and capturing the Kaiser (played by brother Sydney). This would mean that the rainy, miserable part of the film would be reality, and the rest a dream. Instead, Chaplin wakes up all the way back in basic training, which seems a bit extreme, but was probably another way for CC to cover his ass: the critics can’t object to a film about the war if the protagonist (“the doughboy”) never actually makes it “Over there.”
In his novel, Gold does a great job of thinking his way inside Chaplin’s head, but by having Chaplin express misgivings about the “It was all a dream” ending, perhaps he gives CC too much credit. Chaplin would use the hackneyed device again, and in any case was not highly educated or a man with much experience in dramatic writing apart from what he did for the movies. He was inventing his own rules, “writing” by way of rehearsal, and would sometimes take the easy way out when he found himself painted into a narrative corner. And as I’ve suggested, the dream stratagem may have been used, not out of desperation, but to defuse the possible offense of his subject.

My favourite image in SHOULDER ARMS is actually this chauffeur, whose appearance (funny and sinister) is accompanied by a stab of horror movie music in Chaplin’s score.
Anyway, the film is also striking for the things it anticipates: an early tracking shot along a trench looks just like PATHS OF GLORY, only with the Little Fellow in it instead of big fellow Kirk Douglas. Makes Kubrick look a bit cheeky for suggesting that Chaplin was all form and no content. Chaplin’s serial number is 13. Michael Crawford in HOW I WON THE WAR is 131313. Richard Lester, that film’s director, certainly knows his silent comedy. When Chaplin holds a wine bottle aloft so an enemy sniper’s bullet can de-cork it, he’s anticipating Frank Finlay in THE FOUR MUSKETEERS…

July 26, 2009 at 9:00 pm
The release of Shoulder Arms in the autumn of 1918 coincided with Buster Keaton’s departure on a troop ship for France where he served with the US infantry, an episode he would refer to in later life as his ‘career at the rear’. Raised in the multinational world of vaudeville, Keaton held strong anti-war views, but his film, Doughboys, based partly on his own experiences, does not compare well with Shoulder Arms. Made in 1930, shortly after his disastrous move to MGM, it has a couple of entertaining scenes but is a sad comedown from his great silent comedies. And by then the WW1 theme was hardly controversial.
If you can bear to watch it, there’s clip on:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvWkwJhFkcY
July 26, 2009 at 9:42 pm
Those MGM Keatons are so miserable…
Sunnyside is quite strong on how a lot of people with anti-war views didn’t feel able to express them. The comparisons to the current war are striking, especially the sneak attack by British and American forces on Russia, where they hoped democracy would somehow “take root.”
The General is a more nuanced war comedy than Shoulder Arms — it admits the possibility of death, which is largely excluded from the Chaplin. Keaton actually gets grim laughs from men dying.
July 27, 2009 at 1:59 am
Well, that clip has one funny bit — Keaton trying to deal with the unexploded shell, and one spectacular shot, the plane’s POV as it dive-bombs the truck. Worth a look!
July 27, 2009 at 3:57 am
pour some water on that bomb!..That was a fairly amusing Keaton clip..War is a little more entertaining if you drag a girl along I suppose.One of my favorite real movie star WW1 anecdotes is where Basil Rathbone disguises himelf as a Tree to overhear enemy strategy plots..”we’d get a great deal more information from the enemy if we didn’t fool around in the dark so much..”…reminds me of the Holmes film where he says..”As that great american poet Edgar Allen Poe said,The best place to hide something… is where everyone can see it..”
July 27, 2009 at 9:46 am
Wow, Rathbone played a tree? His finest role!
The MGM Keatons are basically a disgrace, but they have a few nice moments. I’m glad I saw that clip because it gives me a sense of the movie without my having to plod through the whole thing. Look like they were influences by Wings, with Clara Bow as an ambulance driver searching for her man…
July 27, 2009 at 9:17 pm
The Rathbone Tree thing is from his real life experiances in the trenches..Its still hard to picture without seeing the comedy in it..Rathbone,the master of disguise, even before Holmes..
July 27, 2009 at 9:49 pm
Is this from a Rathbone bio? I’d like to read the whole story!
July 28, 2009 at 2:41 am
I’ve just seen it in short Web summaries…I’ll have to ask Michael Druxman at that Golden Age of Hollywood Site if he included that in his book..Basil Rathbone:His Life and His Films….a book I thumbed thru in shops many hundreds of years ago..
Amazon.com: Basil Rathbone: His Life and His Films (9780498014710): Michael B. Druxman: Books
July 28, 2009 at 12:24 pm
Rathbone’s WWI adventures would make a great comic book. I’d also like to see the adventures of Samuel Beckett, Josephine Baker and Jean-Pierre Melville in the French Resistance. Jack Kirby would have been perfect to draw Beckett.
July 28, 2009 at 2:38 pm
Chaplin being criticised for not enlisting reminds me of the sad tabloid campaing against Britons working in Hollywood in WW2. most ironically, there were a good bunch of WW1 veterans among them, who were beyond enlisting age and were far more useful to the cause by working in films. I wonder how Herbert Marshall, who lost a leg in the trenches must have felt when slurred by an ENSA boy working far from the firing lines.
I share the feeling that actual rankers and veterans must have enjoyed the film’s gags, which reflect upon the dread conditions of trench fighting in quite a funny way (i.e. the little tramp wearing a rat-trap over his uniform)… I equally suspect that the safe-in-the-back-lines generals and safe-in-Blighty propagandists didn’t laugh so hard.
As an example of what the front-line soldier thought of Chaplin, I’d like to tell the story of a young french subaltern, who was in Paris recovering from his wounds. This young man was a fan of Max Linder, and a friend of his told him about a new comedian in American films called “Charlot”… The young officer went to see his films became a huge admirer of Chaplin. His name? Jean Renoir.
P.S.: comics about WW1/WW2 exploits of cultural icons AND drawn by Jack “the King”? Beckett and his howling commandoes, LOL. Incidentally, I’ve spent sometime researching someone’s WW1 adventures… The obvious choice for the authors would seem to be Pat Mills and Joe Colquhoun, tho’ in this case I’d also like a script by Jaroslav Hasek, or Brecht; in the art, Jacques Tardi, Jean Giraud or Craig P. Russell