Harry Potter and the Mother of Tears

Imagine it: you are horror maestro Dario Argento (this might be a stretch of your empathic faculties, but try to imagine it anyway). Everybody agrees that your violent set-pieces are zesty, cinematic and imaginative. They also agree that your scripts are embarrassing and your direction of actors pitiable. It takes a rare kind of anti-talent to make even a suave devil like Tony Franciosa look uncomfortable onscreen. What do you do?
Well, oddly enough, you don’t seek out talented script collaborators (apart from a one-off pairing with Polanski’s agoraphobic pal Gerard Brach, who was never going to crack your dialogue problems), you settle for the kind of lame hacks who have a sorceress offer her assistance with the words, “Call me anytime. It’s no bother.”
No bother.
Also, you dismiss complaints that your stories don’t make sense with claims that they are “non-Cartesian,” and invoke Poe. True, Poe could single-handedly keep every university English department running for years with the crazy ambiguities of his involuted yarns. But then, he didn’t specialise in dagger-wielding psychos in black gloves in every damn story. And that “logic of nightmares” rigmarole barely washes either, Dario — your films aren’t dreamlike, they’re just lurid. Operatic (although Verdi wasn’t quite as dependent on Satanists and disemboweling), maybe, but pretty much lacking in the uncanny qualities to be found in David Lynch, who can be genuinely scary in a way you can only, well, dream of.
And you don’t seek out the best actors, either. Bridget Fonda, a fan, practically begs to act for you, but you replace her with your daughter, because actors ask too many questions. For some reason you prefer to film your own daughter in the nude, shagging Julian Sands or getting raped by psychopaths. I know you kind of cultivate the “weird” thing, but really…

MOTHER OF TEARS, we can probably say, is a return to form, but unfortunately it’s a return to the dreadful form of PHENOMENA, rather than the sort-of great form of SUSPIRIA (whose appalling dubbing and glazed perfs does actually unwittingly evoke the oneiric, or the badly concussed) — it’s good enough to watch, but only barely. The luminous greens and reds and blues (a palette supposedly leeched from Disney’s SNOW WHITE) are back, Asia Argento’s hungover pre-Raphaelite glamour still radiates a seedy allure, and her mum Daria Nicolodi is back for old time’s sakes. Udo Kier appears, hams endearingly, dies.
The ghost of Nicolodi past.
Here’s another thing, Dario, my cadaverous chum — this misogyny rap. If I were you, I might still shoot a murder scene in which a lesbian witch has a pike shoved up her tuppence until it bursts from her mouth (after all, I’d have a reputation for ground-breaking splatter to maintain), but I’d be sure to frame it in some kind of meaningful context, to express some kind of idea with it. What’s odd about you, Dario, is that you started as a critic but seem painfully uncomfortable with thought of any kind. Explaining that, since you really love women, you’d rather see a beautiful woman killed than an ugly man, might just be a perverse joke, but everything else in your work is on a similarly dumb level. I’m beginning to think you really are that stupid.

Our subject is witches. Unlike in legend, these witches are all female. They provoke civil unrest, dress like Goths, are loud and rude in public places. Are you becoming a grumpy old man, Dario? Do you worry that society is going to wrack and ruin? I’m not sure that’s really a tenable position for the king of slasher gore. The witch-plague is really an excuse for lots of protracted violence, and the beauty of it is that you can film women being killed by witches, and when the witches are killed, well, they are women too. It’s win-win. I notice too that in Italian horror films, whenever women suffer horrific sexual assault with bladed weapons, it’s always performed or instigated by other women (in WHAT HAVE YOU DONE TO SOLANGE? or that real piece of trash, THE NIGHT TRAIN MURDERS). I even saw this device in an episode of Cracker on TV. This has nothing whatsoever to do with real psychopathic practice, but instead seems to be a kind of alibi-ing: the unacceptable act is attributed to the other gender so that the guilty male filmmaker can escape censure. Not that this actually works.
Anyhow, we need some light relief amidst all this recrimination, so it’s pleasing to point out that in THE MOTHER OF TEARS, the third film in a trilogy-of-sorts begun by SUSPIRIA and INFERNO, Asia Argento plays the daughter of a white witch who gave her life fighting the terrible Mater Lacrimosae, injuring that demoness in the process. Perhaps only Asia can defeat the returning witch-queen. In other words, Dario has basically nicked the plot of Harry Potter and thrown in some tits and gore.

July 24, 2009 at 10:54 am
Non-Cartesian! What a useful concept. Like Dario Argento, I too am thoroughly non-Cartesian! Nevertheless, I remain Cartesian enough to ask why that threatening simian appears at the top of the page, sneering with unexplained hostility. Is it intended as a comment on Asia Argento’s limber torso, or her thick-tongued command of English, or maybe her screechy acting? Reluctantly, however, I will admit to a lifelong aversion to all monkeys, my absolute nightmare involves being completely paralyzed and assigned one of those tiny Capuchin monkeys to clean my ears and feed me oatmeal and hop on my chest, while I am helpless to move or even scream. Now that would make a compelling sequence in anyone’s giallo, and I offer it to Dario Argento free of charge.
July 24, 2009 at 11:40 am
The monkey is actually the coolest thing in the movie, since monkeys are genuinely uncanny. I love them, personally (although the one time I had physical contact with one it was kind of distressing). This one is the servant of the Evil Forces. For no reason. But that’s cool.
Romero’s Monkey Shines is the movie for you, my friend.
It’s telling that Dario resorts to “non-Cartesian” to describe his work. OK, so it’s not Cartesian, but what IS it?
I’m being a bit harsh on him — all the nonsense worked great up until Inferno, and the real problem is he’s lost the ability to pace the stuff compellingly. When it moved well, you forgave anything.
July 24, 2009 at 12:03 pm
George Romero stole my nightmare! (He also stole Asia Argento, who contributed another tone-deaf performance in LAND OF THE DEAD). I ‘d like to testify, though, that I’ve had a number of run-ins with monkeys, and they have ALL been distressing.
July 24, 2009 at 12:08 pm
I stopped watching Argento’s new stuff after the genuinely nasty Nonhosonno (basically, your average stalk/slash movie tricked out with sub-Hitchcockian visuals) but I’m tempted by this, it just sounds outrageously silly, and has an actor I know and like, London-born and bred Cristian Solimeno, playing the (Italian, I imagine?) lead. Which can only add to the silliness. The last Argento I genuinely enjoyed was probably Opera, though Phenomena (with its wonderful Donald Pleasance performance and – yes! – a scary homicidal monkey!) will always be a guiltless pleasure right up there with Lifeforce.
July 24, 2009 at 1:11 pm
Asia is probably the perfect lead for her dad’s films, since she has a kind of consistency in her acting that he can’t interfere with. But he should cast her as a psycho, she’s wasted in straight “final girl” roles. Actually, Argento should eliminate the nice protagonists from his work altogether, he hasn’t been able to find any interest in them since Suspiria (when he had a rather fascinating actress).
This one is just about worth watching as an unintentional comedy, and both the leading men are sort of interesting. One is just A BLOKE, lumpen but naturalistic, a strangely destructive breath of fresh air into the claustrophobic colour-coded world Argento stage-manages. And Solimeno is quite self-possessed, you get the impression he could act if called upon to do so.
July 24, 2009 at 4:24 pm
Asia is a ceinematic world unto herself. Besides Dad there’s Patrice Chereau, Gus Van Sant and Abel Ferrara.
Plue she’s directed a film based on the “writings” of a literary hoax.
July 24, 2009 at 5:09 pm
Gah! I’ve just remembered that I owe you a drawing of the man himself. Dissertation duties now done and dusted, I must get to work on that.
July 24, 2009 at 6:59 pm
It’s Gus’ Birthday!
July 24, 2009 at 7:00 pm
I think La Reine Margot was the first film I saw Asia in, killing with poisoned lipstick (start as you mean to go on). And I think she had to learn her French dialogue phonetically, like Bela Lugosi, which endeared her to me.
Look forward to that drawing.
July 24, 2009 at 7:08 pm
Happy birthday Gus!
July 26, 2009 at 3:01 am
Asia was brilliant in ‘Une Vieille Maîtresse’(an excellent French movie from 2007-it has one of the best/weirdest/most surreal sex scenes ever;directed by the extremely dangerous Catherine Breillat;’Maîtresse is the only Breillat film I like).
July 26, 2009 at 11:19 am
That’s a Breillat I haven’t seen. I’ll look out for it. I expected to hate Sex is Comedy, but it was mildly OK.