When the Levee Broke
BLOOD KIN (AKA LAST OF THE MOBILE HOTSHOTS, a horrible title! Sounds like some kind Burt Reynolds movie) is Sidney Lumet’s film of Tennessee Williams’ play The Seven Descents of Myrtle, scripted by Gore Vidal. It was the rarest thing screening in Edinburgh Filmhouse’s recent Williams season, so I felt I couldn’t pass it up. Vidal, of course, is a past master of distorting Williams to suit his own intentions. Here at least he’s less restrained by the censor than he was with SUDDENLY LAST SUMMER.
Lynn Redgrave is loud showgirl Myrtle, James Coburn is sickly landowner Jeb, Robert Hooks is his half-brother, whose dark skin the script is hilariously mealy-mouthed about. Nobody’s quite sure how to refer to his obvious blackness. “Dark-complected” is as explicit as they can get. Performancewise, Coburn is himself, only dying and impotent instead of lusty and strutting. Hooks is zestful and impudent, and Redgrave gloriously loud and theatrical. David Wingrove, also present, described the effect as being like a Little Britain parody of a Tennessee Williams play. He meant it as a compliment, mind you.
A prologue sets up Coburn’s meeting with Redgrave, with them getting married on a cheesy game show and winning a carload of white goods. A great moment at a rancid fast food restaurant, the long-lens frame heaped with trashy Americana, a giant effigy of a cow trundling past on the road. Then the main event:
Maybe the wettest film I ever saw. It may rain more or less constantly in SE7EN and BLADE RUNNER, but it doesn’t soak into you half as much as in this movie. Once the rain begins, we learn that the levee is apt to break, and the whole movie could end up sub-aqueous. The tactile discomfort of all that downpour, and Coburn’s damp, stained white linen suit, has a powerful, exhausting effect.
Hooks, we discover, has a history of surviving floods by taking to the rooftop of the crumbling southern property where the film transpires. Ironically, the whole plot hinges around LAND, land which may shortly become water. Coburn wants to prevent his half-brother from inheriting, by either producing an heir via Redgrave, or getting her to steal the agreement which promises him the property upon Coburn’s (imminent) demise.
I’m skeptical about Quincey Jones’ score: I don’t think he’s a natural film composer, and his music sometimes seems to go off on its own, abandoning the movie. I feel this about most Jones scores, but then he’ll do something brilliant like THE ITALIAN JOB, and I think the problem must be with me.
The bits where the set fades to red and Coburn has a strange interlude, with slo-mo flashbacks of laborious running around with sexy chicks, seem to stop the film dead (nearly all attempts to add “cinematic” values to filmed plays seem to do more harm than good). But I like the chamber piece part of the film, dependant solely on performance, photographed by James Wong Howe in a beautifully crisp fashion. It looks nothing like this still:
And then the ending! Hooks wins the land – just as the flood comes and – united with Redgrave – he flees to the rooftop – as the little three-hander suddenly turns into THE MOST EXPENSIVE FILM EVER. After a miniature shot of floodwater that has a distinct, and humorous, ’70s disaster movie vibe, we see the water crashing through the windows of the house — first floor, second, THIRD! — as the game thespians clamber upwards. It’s preposterously huge and epic and dynamic. Jones’ music suddenly becomes so-wrong-it’s-right, with a blaxploitation exuberance one does not expect to find in Tennessee Williams. After the claustrophobic interiority and long dialogue scenes, this is an eruption of energy that’s truly cathartic.
The black man inherits the land, just as it vanishes beneath the waves. I felt a smidgin of political subtext there, which seemed all the stronger after the election. I don’t see how anybody could have planned it that way, but it was a nice film to see at this moment.
What does Gore think?


November 10, 2008 at 2:51 pm
“Past master of distorting Williams to suit his own intentions”? I beg to differ! Suddenly Last Summer construts a surround to fill out a feature length film but keeps William’s poetry intact. Please read Vidal’s essays about Williams in which he defends him from the fourth estate lynch mob who long ago declared him “ick, twisted, perverted”– well you know the drill. Mr. Vidal broke his spine in a fall quite recently. Surprised he did the BBC interview at all. Not surprised that the BBC is unaware of the hsitory of racism in this country. Apparently the Beeb (and a lot of people who should know better, imagine that a “Magic Negro” has been elected who will not only end racism but –far more important to white America — all memory of it.
There was an amazing “60 Minutes” segment last night in which Obama’s campaign honchos (each and every one of them white) were asked if “race” was brought up in the course of the run for the White House. “Race” invariably means making white people uncomrtable about the history of racism in this country. They of course said no, save for the right’s bringing up Revered Jeremiah Wright and his “God Damn America!” speechifying. The pols were happy to report that Obama handled all of that and they didn’t have to write a word or lift a finger.
The play on which Lumet’s bizarre little movie is based was known as
The Seven Descents of Myrtle (producer David Merrick’s preferred title ad Kingdom of Earth (Tennessee’s choice.) “The Last of the Mobile Hot-Shots” and “Blood Kin” were manufactured by the studio, not Vidal or Williams.
November 10, 2008 at 3:36 pm
Blood Kin at least works as a title.
I think it’s terrible they cut Gore off like that — Dimbleby obviously didn’t fancy takign a pounding on live TV, but really, he should sit there and take his punishment, it’s both entertaining and educational! He gets off on the wrong foot with Vidal not actually be being ignorant, but by asking long, ill-structured and unclear questions. And Vidal gets upset because he can’t work out what the hell this idiot is on about. I’m sure DD is aware of some of the history he’s trying to get Vidal to talk about, he just wants to prompt Gore into being the one to express it. But he does it badly.
DD’s dad was a broadcasting legend, but junior has never had the same clout or smarts. “I think I’ll quit while I’m ahead,” — you’re not ahead, mate!
I was perhaps overly cynical in saying Vidal distorts Williams. Of course he alters him and filters him through his own sensibility, but I don’t claim that’s a betrayal of TW.
I share Vidal’s amazement that the repugs didn’t get nastier. If they could smear John Kerry as a fake war hero, while a draft-dodging drunk sat in the Oval Office, it’s surprising they didn’t express more open racism of the Rush Limbaugh “magic negro” kind this time.
McCain’s “He’s not a muslim, he’s a good family man,” was hilariously revealing though.
November 10, 2008 at 3:37 pm
I’ve read Tennessee Williams’ original text and have of course seen the film and I didn’t think there was any compromise at all in the screen version of ”Suddenly, Last Summer”. So yeah, I was surprised too by what David Cairns meant by that too.
The big differences include changing and lengthening Monty Clift’s character of Dr. Cukrowicz and also the fact that he’s blonde in the play and obviously meant to play as a double of Sebastian’s. As for the homosexuality, it’s clear but never explicitly spelt out in the play as in the film. And the cannibalism is preserved intact complete with the use of the word “devoured”.
I like that film a lot, think it’s best Tennessee Williams’ film and it’s also cinematic without being filmed theatre and without “opening” the play. It’s really like a Fassbinder film before the fact. Fassbinder was inspired by Mankiewicz I believe.
November 10, 2008 at 3:41 pm
——————–
I share Vidal’s amazement that the repugs didn’t get nastier.
——————–
Maybe because they lost so badly in the election(which Vidal didn’t expect either) that they realized that they have to start salvaging as fast as they can and suddenly going after Obama would make them look like sore losers(even more than they already are). In any case I don’t think we’ve seen the Last of the Republicans…
November 10, 2008 at 3:51 pm
I think Gore was being Ironic. There were tons of “Don;t vote for the nigger!” Robocalls in “select” areas.
And yes, those were the precise words used.
November 10, 2008 at 5:22 pm
For Obama to even choose to run for President is something pretty remarkable. I say that in light of the fact that we find ourselves at a point in history where things are such a mess worldwide that it takes someone with real guts and conviction to willingly take on such a job and try tackling it. It remains to be seen as to just how successful or effective he’ll turn out to be, but I’m so very grateful that he’s been given the chance, considering the alternative. I can appreciate the significance of what he and his election represents, but I find the measure of his capabilities of far more concern right now. There’s work to be done, and he’s wasting no time setting himself to the task.
November 10, 2008 at 5:35 pm
“we find ourselves at a point in history where things are such a mess worldwide that it takes someone with real guts and conviction to willingly take on such a job and try tackling it.” Or somebody like a Republican who thinks things are basically just fine the way they are.
Obama, after his CIA briefing on the world’s trouble-spots, is said to have asked “Why did I want this job?”
Most of what I’ve heard about his current plans seems very positive. Today’s Guardian suggests he will veto about 200 of Bush’s most recent bills in order to protect the environment and liberate stem cell research.
The idea of flooding more troops into Afghanistan is the only thing I’m not keen on. That’s not a country anybody has successfully invaded/governed. Trudeau’s “Berzerkistan” isn’t far wrong. The only worthwhile thing he could do there is buy up the poppy harvest.
November 10, 2008 at 5:38 pm
In The Bitter Tears of Petra Von Kant Petra places a call to “Joe Mankiewicz.”
November 10, 2008 at 5:39 pm
“The Seven Descents of Myrtle”-a.k.a.-”Kingdom of Earth” played, in its original 1968 production, a total of 29 performances (as the Internet Broadway Data Base assures me). That was pretty amazingly paltry, given the people involved — although Estelle Parsons *did* get a Tony nomination for Best Actress.
(The “Earth” title echoes David C.’s point of the story’s being about “LAND,” you’ll notice.)
The original had a cast of three, with Brian Bedford in the Coburn role and Harry Guardino in the Hooks role. And I suppose that that last name points out a major difference in the film: the fact that Guardino, playing a “mixed race” role, could be taken for white, whereas Hooks is undeniably black. [Not having seen film or play, I'm working on assumptions here. Consider my apologies offered if what I say is inaccurate.]
*
As for “Suddenly Last Summer” — love the play, have a moderate affection for the movie — I’d say the fact that Catherine is sent off for a lobotomy in the stage version with everyone believing she’s delusional, wheras in the Mankiewicz/Vidal version the mother ends up off-the-deep-end and boy (Clift) gets girl (Taylor) could be said to constitute compromise. Or at least change.
November 10, 2008 at 5:47 pm
I think you’re right about Guardino vs Hooks, and it seems likely that the play was written with a dark-complected white actor in mind. The decision to “go for it” racially is realistic in that one black parent would likely not leave you looking like an Italian American, but surreal given that all the dialogue suggests that the character has something a little non-white about him (“a lick of the tar brush”, the Imperialist Brits used to say). That surreal disconnect between word and image is quite in keeping with the overall feeling, which is indeed “bizarre” although only little until the absurdly grand finale, which plays like Lumet switched final reels with Irwin Allen but somehow kept the cast.
I defer to everybody else on Suddenly Last Summer, which I need to re-see. I get a strong image of Liz Taylor’s throbbing balloons whenever I recall it, and that may be interfering with my recollection of the movie’s other qualities. My other association is John Gielgud’s put-down of it: “Please Don’t Eat the Pansies.”
November 10, 2008 at 6:08 pm
It’s one of Liz’s best erformances. She really responds to Williams’ poetry, particularly in the passage about “Duelling Oaks,” There’s a wonderful look on her face when she starts to recall past events that only she can do. Hepburn is at her bashit-craziest, which of course is perfect for the part. I love her “trails of debris” in that great Hepburn accent. Monty doesn’t have much to do, save look sympathetically at Liz but he’s quite fine.
November 10, 2008 at 6:23 pm
My most vivid memory of Suddenly Last Summer is when Liz puts her cigarette out in the nun’s hand. Delightful. At least I think that’s what happens, it’s been a while since I’ve seen it as well.
November 10, 2008 at 6:39 pm
Ah, nunsploitation.
Those robocalls — would they do anything other than TERRIFY people? Is that the idea, just scare us with the thought of racist robots on the street so we don’t go out and vote? Are there people out there who are racist but who haven’t noticed that Obama is “dark-complected” who would get that call and go “Waitaminute, he IS a nigger! And to think I wuz gonna vote for him.”
What a strange country you fellows live in. (adjusts kilt, tucks into plate of boiled sheep stomach)
November 10, 2008 at 6:40 pm
Yes that’s what happens. She says it was an accident, but the nun claims it was deliberate. As Mankiewicz films it it looks impulsive rather than simly accidental as the nun was getting on her case for smoking at the time.
November 10, 2008 at 6:41 pm
I like Lumet, but, I must say, he does seem to have a bit of a proclivity towards these ‘cinematic values’ of which you speak. The Offence had an opening with some rather blurry/ambiguous sound, an opening which also featured, although it returned intermittently throughout the body of the film, the ghost of a seventies light fitting.
I seem to recall he did something with the cutting of Before The Devil Knows You’re Dead, but that might be my memory toying with me.
Regarding that whipper-snapper Dimbleby: I would be interested to see how Eddie Mair would have interviewed Vidal.
November 10, 2008 at 7:25 pm
One doesn’t interview Gore. Dimply cue him with a few well chosen words and let him rip.
I did a sit-down with him about a year and a half ago at his home here in L.A. Autgraphed pictures of Jackie Kenndy and Amelia Erhart in the parlor. He’s mostly wheelchair bound as he has two artificial hips and a Titanium kneecap. But he tries getting about on crutches as much as possible. He;s being cared for by a very nice nephew and well-mannered young secretary (male bien sur) plus a babe-a-licious “physical therapist” (a tall drink of water in cut-off shorts.)
November 10, 2008 at 8:15 pm
”Suddenly, Last Summer” was the film that made me realize what an excellent actress Liz Taylor was. The final breakdown scene is really, really hard to play for any actress but she does it with such humanity that it’s amazing. I later saw her in Minnelli’s ”The Sandpiper”(the ultimate why-isn’t-this-a-masterpiece? film) and in Huston’s ”Reflections in a Golden Eye”, in both films she’s excellent.
Katharine Hepburn reportedly created hell for Mankiewicz and his producers(apparently she spat at them if we are to believe gossip) but I liked her performance, it’s a great self-parody of her slightly bitchy personality.
I actually think that it was one of Clift’s best performances. In that he really makes that character into a deeper individual. And his delivery of the line about insane being a meaningless word is great.
And to “chris schneider”…
The ending of ”Suddenly, Last Summer” while certainly can be looked at as a conventional boy-meets-girl thing, it’s actually not stressed. For one thing, there’s never a strong sense of attraction on Clift’s part for her and aside from that brief kiss which happens unintentionally, nothing in the sense of chemistry between them. And Clift’s character deals with Liz Taylor professionally, something he wouldn’t have been able to do had he been strongly attached to her. So I don’t see it as leading to romance perse. Besides a principled shrink like Clift’s character is hardly the one to risk his career by marrying his patients so soon after getting her to a breakthrough.
November 10, 2008 at 8:34 pm
The Offence is strong stuff, I would see the self-consciously “cinematic” stuff (which Huston has a tendency towards also) as a minor blemish.
Lumet shows how to handle Kate Hepburn in his indispensible Making Movies. On Long Day’s Journey he proposed starting rehearsals on a certain date, and she said ,”Oh no, if we start then you’ll know it better than I.” He decided then she was going to be trouble.
They started read-throughs on her date of choice, and he gave her no direction, while lavishing care on the other players. After a day of this, a small voice from the back of the room said “Help.”
LUMET MUST DOMINATE.
November 10, 2008 at 8:41 pm
My dear late freind Vito Russo ( of “Celluloid Closet” fame) was quite close to Judy Garland in her later years, and he told me she took grave exception to Hepburn’s performance in Long Day’s Journey Into Night as regards drug addiction. “She doesn’t know wha it’s about AT ALL!” said Judy — who most certainly did.
November 10, 2008 at 8:47 pm
Re Liz: people don’t get to be movie stars for free. She’s an exceptionally beautiful women. But beauty alone doesn’t make a star. It’s the ability to project that beauty that does the trick. Of course being a star she didn’t have a wide range. But who needs that with the sort of commanding
parts she was given? What’s amazing is the way she kept going well into middle-age. Who’s Afraid of Virgina Woolf was a watershed — showing the public on-screen much of the humor that made her a legend off. She “got” Albee instantaneously.
I quite like her in the insane Boom! and the Feverish Secret Ceremony. She;s also great fun in X, Y and Zee (aka. Zee and Company) especially when she’s called on to imitate Sussanah York.
November 10, 2008 at 9:05 pm
One of the most unintentionally funny moments on British television so far this year was when Melvyn Bragg did another brilliant interview with Gore Vidal for The South Bank Show. The programme climaxed with a wonderfully acerbic view of the state of the world, then the credits came up and immediately a perky continuity annoucer said “tomorrow at 9 – the Duchess of York spends a week living with a family on a council estate to teach them proper values! That’s tomorrow at 9!”
It had me laughing for at least ten minutes….then there were another twenty to thirty minutes of bitter tears of anger!
Of course 2007s horrible moment on British television was the sign off from Channel 4 news on the night of Ingmar Bergman’s death – the presenters Jon Snow and Krishnan Guru-Murthy said goodnight and turned to a mocked-up chess game. As the credits ran and the lights dimmed Krishnan gleefully shouted at Snow “Checkmate! You’re dead!”
If anything required a Russell Brand/Jonathan Ross backlash of indignation which involved a few sackings and abject apologies, that would have been it!
November 10, 2008 at 9:07 pm
Just came back from browsing the local university Barnes & Noble a few blocks away, and scanned their sale DVDs. Two piqued my interest, Altman’s The Long Goodbye and Lumet’s The Fugitive Kind, selling for $5 and $8 respectively. I’ve seen the former, not the latter. Suggestions, advice? I’m leaning toward Snakeskin.
November 10, 2008 at 9:08 pm
Blood Kin sounds fascinating – I wonder why it isn’t getting better known?
I’ve often thought Elizabeth Taylor was underrated, though I also feel the same way, if not to the same extent, about Joan Collins.
November 10, 2008 at 9:15 pm
That was just part of an overall lack of respect that showed how far British TV has fallen. Jeremy Paxman should spend eternity strapped to a cinema chair with eyelids pinned open, watching Persona.
As far as middle-aged Liz Taylor vehicles goes, I’m in a bit of a minority, since I quite like The Comedians. Which I’ve never heard anyone stick up for, EVER. But I mainly like it for Guinness.
It seems nowadays when you look into Liz’s career, you’re more likely to come across these later films, which make the revelation of her jaw-dropping glamour in youth all the more astonishing when one encounters it.
I find Virginia Woolf tremendously enjoyable, although I don’t think of it as a great film. But the perfs are so terrific, I can never resist.
November 10, 2008 at 10:03 pm
The Fugitive Kind is teriffic. And totally BONKERS. Brando and Magnani were such a pair of divas Lumet had his hands full just trying to call “Action!” The supporting cast is great, especially Joanne Woodward playing what my boyfriend Bill claims is an exact replica of himself in high school.
November 10, 2008 at 10:04 pm
The Fugitive Kind is rather good. Again, Lumet scores on tactile things: a skin-crawling atmosphere of evil and physical discomfort. Brando I find fascinating in it. Magnani is…full-blooded. I’d cautiously recommend it.
November 10, 2008 at 10:05 pm
Meanwhile. . .Ken Russell directs a play in New York.
November 10, 2008 at 10:07 pm
Oh yeah, Woodward is AWESOME.
Why isn’t Blood Kin better known? The plethora of titles probably doesn’t help. And it’s an odd cast, which probably cancels itself out: do Coburn fans like Redgrave, and vice versa? But it’s extremely pleasing to see them together! I sometimes find her a little…broad. She kind of blows a hole in the excellent Gods and Monsters. Here her hyperintensity is perfectly suited to the fervid prose, and matched by Hooks. Coburn looks on in wonderment.
November 10, 2008 at 10:19 pm
Wow. The psychological thriller isn’t really Ken’s genre, is it? And as for theatre, when either Gabriel Byrne or Julian Sands, I forget which, suggested he wasn’t really an actor’s director, he said “I would say that’s an understatement.”
(But some actors have found him inspirational.)
But this sounds kind of intriguing. Kudos to the excellent Carradine for giving Ken a crack at something new.
November 10, 2008 at 11:02 pm
Note to “Arthur S.”: Chris (short for Christopher) Schneider is my actual name. No need for quotation marks. What’s more, David E. can attest that — unlike the aliens in “It Came From Outer Space” — I let myself be seen in my true form. From time to time.
As for Clift and Taylor at the end of the “Suddenly Last Summer” movie … I was using rhetorical exaggeration when I wrote “boy gets girl.” Still, though, they’re the male and female leads of the film and they wind up in close proximitiy. Which, given Classical Hollywood Style, encourages certain conclusions. Although it may be a similar to what George Sidney — the only Big Hollywood Director I ever met — told me about Sinatra and Kim Novak at the end of “Pal Joey”: impermanent in the extreme. Sinatra and Novak walk off together … and Sidney told me that their union probably lasted as long as it took them to cross that (literal) bridge.
November 10, 2008 at 11:22 pm
By the way, I entirely agree with David E. about Woodward in “The Fugitive Kind.” One of the first things I thuink of when I think of that film is the scene where Brando prepares to drive with Woodward in a convertable and he tells her to move over her legs … both of ‘em …
That photo of Kathleen McNenny in the Russell-directed play had me wondering if this and the China Blue character in “Crimes of Passion” were his notion of the way women really look.
November 10, 2008 at 11:33 pm
Thanks gents, Snakeskin it is.
November 10, 2008 at 11:35 pm
Maybe just his beautiful dream of how women SHOULD look? Ken has enjoyably strange taste.
The story of how he met his present wife is very sweet — and strange.
I think you’ll like The Fugee Kind. It does seem like it’s the point of origin for Nicholas Cage’s snakeskin jacket in Wild at Heart.
November 11, 2008 at 2:20 am
Your absolutely right about the jacket. But Cage lacks Woodward’s toughness.
November 11, 2008 at 6:08 am
To Chris,
I didn’t mean to imply that your name was fake…sorry if I offended you.
I agree with Mr. Sidney in that one shouldn’t buy the romance at face value. In many of the old Hollywood films, love interest or romance was kind of dictated by the bosses or likewise and it wasn’t necessarily a primary concern of the film. But somehow people always assume romance because of what is called “classical Hollywood style” whatever that means.
Like with ”Psycho”, I know so many people who believe that John Gavin and Vera Miles in the second half will end up getting married and fall in love because we are encouraged to do so by so many banal films and of course the fact that Vera Miles is an attractive girl, single, and she’s Marion’s sister and meant as compensation for John Gavin’s loss of Marion. This would be the norm in a banal film but in Hitchcock there is absolutely no sense of romance between them. They never even smile at each other. And yet people keep dreaming a romance.
The same with ”Suddenly, Last Summer”.
November 11, 2008 at 6:57 am
And here’s another “happy” couple in one of the greatest endings of all time.
November 11, 2008 at 9:36 am
My only possible criticism is that maybe they should have had somebody waggle the bushes around in the background of her shot, right at the start of that excerpt.
Ben Hecht wrote that in “classical style”, since it always faded to black before the hero and heroine make love, he started to imagine that every fade-out lead to frenzied coupling. This can be a pretty amusing way to liven up a dull film.
November 11, 2008 at 10:46 am
—————————-
Ben Hecht wrote that in “classical style”, since it always faded to black before the hero and heroine make love, he started to imagine that every fade-out lead to frenzied coupling.
—————————–
In some films it kind of makes it obvious. Like in ”A Star is Born”, Cukor shows this scene after their wedding in their room and James Mason and Judy Garland have this deep kiss and it fades out. No need to spell *that* out. Then almost everyone and their grand-nephew knows what happens between Bogart and Dorothy Malone after she turns the curtains down to her bookshop and the scene fades out…in the ”The Big Sleep”.
”Splendor in the Grass” is a great film by the way, not my favourite of Kazan’s(that’s ”East of Eden” and ”Wild River”) but beautiful and Natalie Wood is excellent. And one thing I love about the ending of the film is Kazan’s generosity, like there’s this brief cut-insert of Warren Beatty’s wife looking at Wood uncomfortably, not many directors would do that treating her as a bland housewife but Kazan makes her part of the scene as well. And her jealousy is understandable since she stood by Beatty after he lost all that money and loved him for who he was.
November 11, 2008 at 5:09 pm
In The Big Sleep — I guess Bogie catches up on his reading, right?
True about the wife in Splendor, she’s very much included, and her emotions are given equal weight by the cutting.
November 19, 2008 at 3:22 am
Scroll down into this, and you’ll find a bit more about Ken Russell and that new play.
[Recommendation: Start with the paragraph beginning "A one-man folk opera, Ken Russell."]
http://www.villagevoice.com/2008-11-19/columns/oscar-nominee-swallowed-after-bj/
November 19, 2008 at 10:55 am
Lovely. An email acquaintance put together a 300-style digital epic about Boudicca for ken to direct, and again he turned up with his own props and costumes — joke shop swords etc. My friend had turned up some real metal ones, so Ken, after agonizing briefly, ditched his plastic weaponry.