<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Isn&#8217;t it a bit old-hat?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/isnt-it-a-bit-old-hat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/isnt-it-a-bit-old-hat/</link>
	<description>David Cairns' wilfully eccentric film blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dcairns</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/isnt-it-a-bit-old-hat/#comment-2868</link>
		<dc:creator>dcairns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=683#comment-2868</guid>
		<description>I was just agreeing with you that The Man Who... would be a likely remake, then I realised they'd already sort-of done it with The Road to Eldorado. Not that that will stop them. What might stop them is the fact that it's basically about a doomed western attempt to conquer Alfghanistan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just agreeing with you that The Man Who&#8230; would be a likely remake, then I realised they&#8217;d already sort-of done it with The Road to Eldorado. Not that that will stop them. What might stop them is the fact that it&#8217;s basically about a doomed western attempt to conquer Alfghanistan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/isnt-it-a-bit-old-hat/#comment-2866</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=683#comment-2866</guid>
		<description>my favourite thing about the quiller memorandum is the way alec guinness always arranges his appointments at odd times. i don't know if this appears in the novel but i reckon it is a pinter touch because it fits in with the way his characters tussle for superiority by making things awkward for one another

the next michael caine remake will be the man who would be king. bryan brown is playing michael caine, michael caine is playing sean connery, and sean connery is playing golf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my favourite thing about the quiller memorandum is the way alec guinness always arranges his appointments at odd times. i don&#8217;t know if this appears in the novel but i reckon it is a pinter touch because it fits in with the way his characters tussle for superiority by making things awkward for one another</p>
<p>the next michael caine remake will be the man who would be king. bryan brown is playing michael caine, michael caine is playing sean connery, and sean connery is playing golf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcairns</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/isnt-it-a-bit-old-hat/#comment-2855</link>
		<dc:creator>dcairns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=683#comment-2855</guid>
		<description>Guinness was a superb interpreter of Pinter too. I sometimes think HP has a tendency to self-parody, but then sometimes I think that's when he's at his absolute best. I do prefer him when he's funny. Sleuth is pretty funny in places, but I remember laughing more at the original.

A Zulu remake would be quite likely, Colin, but not unless they can find a way to make the ending more, y'know, UPBEAT.

Branagh has a tendency to try to solve problems by putting a lot of ENERGY up on screen -- this is at it's worst in his Frankenstein, where the burly camera moves get irksome within minutes. I was kind of on Dead Again's side until the slo-mo climax. And Ken was a terrible detective hero. Em wasn't really suited to either of her roles. The idea of the same actors appearing in the flashbacks was a bit of a cheat -- and it came from Ken.

i do hope Ruiz gets to make his Scottish Jekyll &#38; Hyde -- but that shonky-but-popular recent TV version may stand in his path.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guinness was a superb interpreter of Pinter too. I sometimes think HP has a tendency to self-parody, but then sometimes I think that&#8217;s when he&#8217;s at his absolute best. I do prefer him when he&#8217;s funny. Sleuth is pretty funny in places, but I remember laughing more at the original.</p>
<p>A Zulu remake would be quite likely, Colin, but not unless they can find a way to make the ending more, y&#8217;know, UPBEAT.</p>
<p>Branagh has a tendency to try to solve problems by putting a lot of ENERGY up on screen &#8212; this is at it&#8217;s worst in his Frankenstein, where the burly camera moves get irksome within minutes. I was kind of on Dead Again&#8217;s side until the slo-mo climax. And Ken was a terrible detective hero. Em wasn&#8217;t really suited to either of her roles. The idea of the same actors appearing in the flashbacks was a bit of a cheat &#8212; and it came from Ken.</p>
<p>i do hope Ruiz gets to make his Scottish Jekyll &amp; Hyde &#8212; but that shonky-but-popular recent TV version may stand in his path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ehrenstein</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/isnt-it-a-bit-old-hat/#comment-2854</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ehrenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=683#comment-2854</guid>
		<description>Glad you mentioned &lt;i&gt;The Quiller Memorandum&lt;/i&gt; which contains one of my favorite Pinter dialogue exchanges. George Segal has just escaped from the clutches of Max Von Sydow and met up with his boss Alec Guinesss.

Segal: And then they told me they were going to kill me.

Guiness: Oh. And did they succeed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you mentioned <i>The Quiller Memorandum</i> which contains one of my favorite Pinter dialogue exchanges. George Segal has just escaped from the clutches of Max Von Sydow and met up with his boss Alec Guinesss.</p>
<p>Segal: And then they told me they were going to kill me.</p>
<p>Guiness: Oh. And did they succeed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ehrenstein</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/isnt-it-a-bit-old-hat/#comment-2853</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ehrenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=683#comment-2853</guid>
		<description>Pinter's Proust script for Losey is OK, but Suzo Checche D'amico's for Visconti is better. 

However it was Ruiz who stepped in and cleaned evryone's clock when it came to &lt;a href="http://ehrensteinland.com/htmls/g006/marcelproust.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Marcel Proust&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pinter&#8217;s Proust script for Losey is OK, but Suzo Checche D&#8217;amico&#8217;s for Visconti is better. </p>
<p>However it was Ruiz who stepped in and cleaned evryone&#8217;s clock when it came to <a href="http://ehrensteinland.com/htmls/g006/marcelproust.html" rel="nofollow">Marcel Proust</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colinr</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/isnt-it-a-bit-old-hat/#comment-2852</link>
		<dc:creator>colinr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=683#comment-2852</guid>
		<description>I'm ambivalent on Branagh, I quite like his Shakespeare stuff and recently rewatched Dead Again which is a big guilty pleasure and the over the top stuff (HUGE close ups of scissors screaming 'dangerously sharp and pointy' at the camera!) works wonderfully with what seems to be a giallo inspired plot.

However it was just too uch for "Mary Shelley's" Frankenstein (she should have sued!), the film that puts 'bomb' in bombastic!

I quite like the original Sleuth but have so far steered away from the remake because everything about it seems a little off the mark from the performances to the sets, which suggests that there wasn't much understanding of what made the original dated but special as a twisty time capsule set in a house full of bric a brac that made it seem like the costume changes and play acting was inevitable from the amount of stuff lying around for the characters to play with! I'm sure I'll catch up with the remake soon though to see what it turns out like.

The next Michael Caine remake? - My money's on Zulu with Caine as the african chief!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m ambivalent on Branagh, I quite like his Shakespeare stuff and recently rewatched Dead Again which is a big guilty pleasure and the over the top stuff (HUGE close ups of scissors screaming &#8216;dangerously sharp and pointy&#8217; at the camera!) works wonderfully with what seems to be a giallo inspired plot.</p>
<p>However it was just too uch for &#8220;Mary Shelley&#8217;s&#8221; Frankenstein (she should have sued!), the film that puts &#8216;bomb&#8217; in bombastic!</p>
<p>I quite like the original Sleuth but have so far steered away from the remake because everything about it seems a little off the mark from the performances to the sets, which suggests that there wasn&#8217;t much understanding of what made the original dated but special as a twisty time capsule set in a house full of bric a brac that made it seem like the costume changes and play acting was inevitable from the amount of stuff lying around for the characters to play with! I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll catch up with the remake soon though to see what it turns out like.</p>
<p>The next Michael Caine remake? - My money&#8217;s on Zulu with Caine as the african chief!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcairns</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/isnt-it-a-bit-old-hat/#comment-2851</link>
		<dc:creator>dcairns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=683#comment-2851</guid>
		<description>You're right, ambiguity is the wrong word. 

I love The Collection, which is where I formed the impression that Alan Bates is the perfect Pinter actor. But Larrio is great in it, and everyone else too. My favourite Lar perf is in Bunny Lake is Missing, but his Pinter ranks high too.

I ought to get myself a copy of Pinter's Proust script, written for Losey. I love his Victory, written for Lester.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, ambiguity is the wrong word. </p>
<p>I love The Collection, which is where I formed the impression that Alan Bates is the perfect Pinter actor. But Larrio is great in it, and everyone else too. My favourite Lar perf is in Bunny Lake is Missing, but his Pinter ranks high too.</p>
<p>I ought to get myself a copy of Pinter&#8217;s Proust script, written for Losey. I love his Victory, written for Lester.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ehrenstein</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/isnt-it-a-bit-old-hat/#comment-2844</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ehrenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=683#comment-2844</guid>
		<description>Well I greatly enjoyed it and was rather annoyed at the way it was dismissed over here. IMO Pinter is clearly the &lt;i&gt;auteur&lt;/i&gt;&#62; First of all he's "getting his own back" as the original is a clear steal of a Pinter power-play set-up. Plus, unlike Shaffer, he cuts to the chase. Instead of the musty "I understand you've been having anaffair with my wife" we get "I hear you've been fucking my wife!"

The sets are quite funny in that they ape the Ken Adame we're familair woth from the Bond films rather than the Ken who did the Mankiewicz and Kubrick's &lt;i&gt;Barry Lyndon&lt;/i&gt;. 

As for the sexuality I wouldn't call it "ambiguous" at all. The entire set-up hinges on the all-important question "Who will make the first pass?" Pinter is far wiser than any of us when it comes to sexuality in all it's multifarious wonder. Be sure to get ahold of the video of the magnificent TV remake (it was a TV play to begin with) of &lt;i&gt;The Collection&lt;/i&gt;, directed by Michael Apted and starring Alan Bates, Laurence Olivier, Malcolm McDowell and Helen Mirren. (Shot sometime in the 70's I think.) It has far and away my favorite Olivier performance. I particularly love the relish with which he delivers the speech in which he explains to Bates how he met McDowell: "He's a slum boy you see. That's how I met him. I happened to be in a slum one day and. . .&lt;i&gt;there he was&lt;/i&gt;!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I greatly enjoyed it and was rather annoyed at the way it was dismissed over here. IMO Pinter is clearly the <i>auteur</i>&gt; First of all he&#8217;s &#8220;getting his own back&#8221; as the original is a clear steal of a Pinter power-play set-up. Plus, unlike Shaffer, he cuts to the chase. Instead of the musty &#8220;I understand you&#8217;ve been having anaffair with my wife&#8221; we get &#8220;I hear you&#8217;ve been fucking my wife!&#8221;</p>
<p>The sets are quite funny in that they ape the Ken Adame we&#8217;re familair woth from the Bond films rather than the Ken who did the Mankiewicz and Kubrick&#8217;s <i>Barry Lyndon</i>. </p>
<p>As for the sexuality I wouldn&#8217;t call it &#8220;ambiguous&#8221; at all. The entire set-up hinges on the all-important question &#8220;Who will make the first pass?&#8221; Pinter is far wiser than any of us when it comes to sexuality in all it&#8217;s multifarious wonder. Be sure to get ahold of the video of the magnificent TV remake (it was a TV play to begin with) of <i>The Collection</i>, directed by Michael Apted and starring Alan Bates, Laurence Olivier, Malcolm McDowell and Helen Mirren. (Shot sometime in the 70&#8217;s I think.) It has far and away my favorite Olivier performance. I particularly love the relish with which he delivers the speech in which he explains to Bates how he met McDowell: &#8220;He&#8217;s a slum boy you see. That&#8217;s how I met him. I happened to be in a slum one day and. . .<i>there he was</i>!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elver</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/isnt-it-a-bit-old-hat/#comment-2841</link>
		<dc:creator>Elver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 08:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=683#comment-2841</guid>
		<description>I saw it recently and... I really, really wanted to like it. I love "theater style" in film. I want to see it used more and more. But with some notable exceptions (GLENGARRY GLEN ROSS, PROOF) it tends to fall flat on its face. It's a pity, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw it recently and&#8230; I really, really wanted to like it. I love &#8220;theater style&#8221; in film. I want to see it used more and more. But with some notable exceptions (GLENGARRY GLEN ROSS, PROOF) it tends to fall flat on its face. It&#8217;s a pity, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
