<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Blog Possessed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/a-blog-possessed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/a-blog-possessed/</link>
	<description>David Cairns' wilfully eccentric film blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dcairns</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/a-blog-possessed/#comment-1625</link>
		<dc:creator>dcairns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 18:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=328#comment-1625</guid>
		<description>Callow's are the fullest biographies, but the best Welles books aren't bios -- even though his was a full and fascinating life.

I like the sound of &lt;em&gt;Orson Welles at Work&lt;/em&gt;, myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Callow&#8217;s are the fullest biographies, but the best Welles books aren&#8217;t bios &#8212; even though his was a full and fascinating life.</p>
<p>I like the sound of <em>Orson Welles at Work</em>, myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Clifford</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/a-blog-possessed/#comment-1624</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 18:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=328#comment-1624</guid>
		<description>Thank You! I've been informed about Callows's books before so I'll check them out. Great site by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You! I&#8217;ve been informed about Callows&#8217;s books before so I&#8217;ll check them out. Great site by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcairns</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/a-blog-possessed/#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>dcairns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 10:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=328#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>Hi again!

&lt;em&gt;The Whole Equation &lt;/em&gt;MIGHT be good. Thomson still writes well, but he seems to have lost his enthusiasm for film. When he writes about actresses he's just sleazy and makes himself ludicrous. The more recent edition of the film dictionary has a piece on Kiarostami where he basically says "Everybody's talking about how this guy's the great new poet of cinema. I looked at one of his films and, I dunno, doesn't seem that great to ME." Based on ONE film! That shows contempt for the filmmaker, for the critics who have praised him, and for the readers of the book. So, yes, although I called him "tired" (I was feeling polite), "lazy" is good too.

I think it shows in &lt;em&gt;Rosebud &lt;/em&gt;too -- he really just rolls out all the Hollywood cliches about Welles. He's good on Kane, then increasingly sloppy on everything else. Fortunately Simon Callow's Welles books seem to be improving, actually growing in sympathy ashe moves through the career, and we have lots of other good stuff like &lt;em&gt;This Is Orson Welles &lt;/em&gt;and &lt;em&gt;Whatever Happened to...? &lt;/em&gt;and I'm told &lt;em&gt;Welles at Work &lt;/em&gt;is terrific too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again!</p>
<p><em>The Whole Equation </em>MIGHT be good. Thomson still writes well, but he seems to have lost his enthusiasm for film. When he writes about actresses he&#8217;s just sleazy and makes himself ludicrous. The more recent edition of the film dictionary has a piece on Kiarostami where he basically says &#8220;Everybody&#8217;s talking about how this guy&#8217;s the great new poet of cinema. I looked at one of his films and, I dunno, doesn&#8217;t seem that great to ME.&#8221; Based on ONE film! That shows contempt for the filmmaker, for the critics who have praised him, and for the readers of the book. So, yes, although I called him &#8220;tired&#8221; (I was feeling polite), &#8220;lazy&#8221; is good too.</p>
<p>I think it shows in <em>Rosebud </em>too &#8212; he really just rolls out all the Hollywood cliches about Welles. He&#8217;s good on Kane, then increasingly sloppy on everything else. Fortunately Simon Callow&#8217;s Welles books seem to be improving, actually growing in sympathy ashe moves through the career, and we have lots of other good stuff like <em>This Is Orson Welles </em>and <em>Whatever Happened to&#8230;? </em>and I&#8217;m told <em>Welles at Work </em>is terrific too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/a-blog-possessed/#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=328#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>Hello, you may have noticed me lurking around this blog before....leaving the odd comment here or there...anyway..

I was browsing my local bookshop today and I came across The Whole Equation: A History of Hollywood by David Thomson and I nearly bought it but.....you stopped me.Yes you!! I remembered you writing that he used to be good but that he had become lazy or something to that effect. I have Dictionary of Film and read Rosebud when I was maybe 11. Im 22 now. I also read The Guardian in which he has an irregular column. I was just wondering what you meant by 'Lazy' and 'Tired'

I wasn't sure if this was the right place to ask so apologies!

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, you may have noticed me lurking around this blog before&#8230;.leaving the odd comment here or there&#8230;anyway..</p>
<p>I was browsing my local bookshop today and I came across The Whole Equation: A History of Hollywood by David Thomson and I nearly bought it but&#8230;..you stopped me.Yes you!! I remembered you writing that he used to be good but that he had become lazy or something to that effect. I have Dictionary of Film and read Rosebud when I was maybe 11. Im 22 now. I also read The Guardian in which he has an irregular column. I was just wondering what you meant by &#8216;Lazy&#8217; and &#8216;Tired&#8217;</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t sure if this was the right place to ask so apologies!</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcairns</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/a-blog-possessed/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>dcairns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=328#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>"He was a big guy, not talented. We called him the iron stove," says Edgar Ulmer. But &lt;em&gt;The Devil and Daniel Webster &lt;/em&gt;is an amazing piece of expressionist Americana, deploying many of Welles' tricks, and many of his crew. His &lt;em&gt;Hunchback of Notre Dame &lt;/em&gt;made a huge impression on this kid. "He hits a shade of purple few can match," says B. Kite, which is true enough, but he'll always have a place in my heart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He was a big guy, not talented. We called him the iron stove,&#8221; says Edgar Ulmer. But <em>The Devil and Daniel Webster </em>is an amazing piece of expressionist Americana, deploying many of Welles&#8217; tricks, and many of his crew. His <em>Hunchback of Notre Dame </em>made a huge impression on this kid. &#8220;He hits a shade of purple few can match,&#8221; says B. Kite, which is true enough, but he&#8217;ll always have a place in my heart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ehrenstein</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/a-blog-possessed/#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ehrenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=328#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>Anna Magnani would have turned 100 years old today.

Dieterle is a fascinating figure. His silent &lt;i&gt;Sex in Chains&lt;/i&gt; is fascinating. Love &lt;i&gt;Portrait of Jennie&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Love Leeters&lt;/i&gt;. His Max Reinhardt collaboration on &lt;i&gt;A Midsummer Night's Dream&lt;/i&gt; is spectacular. And he's quite good in an acting role in Murnau's &lt;i&gt;Faust&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anna Magnani would have turned 100 years old today.</p>
<p>Dieterle is a fascinating figure. His silent <i>Sex in Chains</i> is fascinating. Love <i>Portrait of Jennie</i> and <i>Love Leeters</i>. His Max Reinhardt collaboration on <i>A Midsummer Night&#8217;s Dream</i> is spectacular. And he&#8217;s quite good in an acting role in Murnau&#8217;s <i>Faust</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcairns</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/a-blog-possessed/#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>dcairns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=328#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>Wow, it's like Bette &#38; Joan Go Italia!
I like the sound of Volcano, Dieterle is very good at OTT histrionics in exotic places. We got a kick out of Elephant Walk when we ran it last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it&#8217;s like Bette &amp; Joan Go Italia!<br />
I like the sound of Volcano, Dieterle is very good at OTT histrionics in exotic places. We got a kick out of Elephant Walk when we ran it last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ehrenstein</title>
		<link>http://dcairns.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/a-blog-possessed/#comment-1606</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ehrenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcairns.wordpress.com/?p=328#comment-1606</guid>
		<description>You forgot the best line! When Van Heflin is fashioning some girder or other for the project he's constructing and a peeved Joan quips "I'm prettier than a girder."

That is, needless to say, a matter of opinion.

Geraldine Brooks is quite teriffic as the daughter. A Geraldine Brooks film festival would include Ophuls' fabulous &lt;i&gt;The Reckless Moment&lt;/i&gt; and Dieterle's &lt;i&gt;Volcano&lt;/i&gt; -- a marvelous piece of nonsense starring Anna Magnani.

It seems that Roberto Rossellini originally wrote &lt;i&gt;Stromboli&lt;/i&gt; for Magnani. But then he met Ingrid Bergman. Magnani was dumped from his life and (worst of all) from the film. But nobody dumps Anna Magnani and gets off scot free. So she confected &lt;i&gt;Volcano&lt;/i&gt; -- a rival production shot at the same time at an adjoining island. Every evening during the shoot Magnani would climb the highest peak of her island and rain curses down on Rossellini and Bergman. Co-starring Rossano Brazzi with a script by Erskine Caldwell, &lt;i&gt;Volcano&lt;/i&gt; ain't bad. But it ain't &lt;i&gt;Stromboli&lt;/i&gt;. 

Clever Anna finished her film in advance of Rossellini's. And there she was at the first press screening ready to answer questions when all of a sudden the news everyone had been waiting for flew through the room -- Berman had just given birth to her "love child." The place emptied out &lt;i&gt;like that&lt;/i&gt;,  leaving La Magnani to rage curses at the empty air.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot the best line! When Van Heflin is fashioning some girder or other for the project he&#8217;s constructing and a peeved Joan quips &#8220;I&#8217;m prettier than a girder.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is, needless to say, a matter of opinion.</p>
<p>Geraldine Brooks is quite teriffic as the daughter. A Geraldine Brooks film festival would include Ophuls&#8217; fabulous <i>The Reckless Moment</i> and Dieterle&#8217;s <i>Volcano</i> &#8212; a marvelous piece of nonsense starring Anna Magnani.</p>
<p>It seems that Roberto Rossellini originally wrote <i>Stromboli</i> for Magnani. But then he met Ingrid Bergman. Magnani was dumped from his life and (worst of all) from the film. But nobody dumps Anna Magnani and gets off scot free. So she confected <i>Volcano</i> &#8212; a rival production shot at the same time at an adjoining island. Every evening during the shoot Magnani would climb the highest peak of her island and rain curses down on Rossellini and Bergman. Co-starring Rossano Brazzi with a script by Erskine Caldwell, <i>Volcano</i> ain&#8217;t bad. But it ain&#8217;t <i>Stromboli</i>. </p>
<p>Clever Anna finished her film in advance of Rossellini&#8217;s. And there she was at the first press screening ready to answer questions when all of a sudden the news everyone had been waiting for flew through the room &#8212; Berman had just given birth to her &#8220;love child.&#8221; The place emptied out <i>like that</i>,  leaving La Magnani to rage curses at the empty air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
