The idiot box
“Television is known as a medium, because it is neither rare nor well done.”

I just had three clips deleted from Youtube, because the production company involved protested I was violating their copyright. Of course I WAS violating their copyright, and they’re perfectly within their rights. I just figured they wouldn’t mind if an old show they made, which isn’t on air anymore, maintaining some kind of tenuous presence in the public’s mind.
(Actually, yesterday was Youtube Trouble Day — just as I embedded that great clip of Lee Hazlewood and Nancy Sinatra, the person who’d Youtubed it disabled embedding, doubtless peeved that I had likened the teen Nancy to a mythological cave creature. I thought I’d taken the sting from that epithet by complimenting her on blossoming into the flower of young womanhood seen in the Some Velvet Morning promo, but apparently “Hubertblues”, if that really is his name, was not placated. Sorry, H.B.)
Don’t worry, the video clips were not things I’ve used on this blog, because I like you guys too much. The show, which I’d worked on extensively, was really… not too great. I’d posted what I thought were the best bits, partly for the relief of separating them out from the truly unwatchable baloney appended by the production company.
But since this anonymous co. has messed me around, and since they were truly nightmarish to work with, I am retaliating, pointlessly, with some brief character sketches. These might prove useful as an awful warning for those contemplating careers in television, they might be amusing to anybody in the Scottish television industry who can recognise the personages referred to from their descriptions, but mostly they are a VENTING OF SPLEEN.
Oh, and one or all of them may in fact be entirely fictitious, just to keep the libel lawyers sedentary.
(1) The puffy figurehead: he tore a strip out of one of my colleagues for daring to have lunch. All the bad stuff happened on his watch, so I’m holding him responsible even though I doubt he knew about ANY of it. I bumped into somebody who used to work for him, who said he’d blatantly stolen their ideas, and “can’t bear to be contradicted, runs the place like a private fiefdom and hands out promotions like sweeties so he’s surrounded by people under-qualified for their jobs.” Enough of him.
(2) The weird, quiet, passive-aggressive fortysomething who still lives with his mum. Used the opportunity of a production job, which he seriously sucked at, in order to give himself a writing job, which he UNBELIEVABLY sucked at. NOBODY would have hired this guy to write ANYTHING, except this guy. Of course, he was biased, but he was probably also dumb and tasteless enough to have hired himself as writer even if he’d been a stranger. Basically this guy was responsible for both the slipshod management of the show, the unpleasant pressure, the derelict artistic direction, and also he was directly, personally responsible for actually GENERATING most of the garbage we had to use in the episodes just to fill out the running time.
(3) The creepy, creepy, creepy minor functionary who failed to perform his meagre tasks worth a damn but rose up the microcephallic totem pole irresistibly, like damp, inserting covert smut and vile misogyny into this ostensibly child-oriented, ostensibly educational, ostensibly entertaining show. Nobody’s mind was actually dirty enough to catch all the innuendos he was inserting, so that a heavily-disguised reference to anal sex with a little girl actually made it into one episode.
(4) The lackadaisical technician who executed his duties so listlessly and uncaringly, you would think he was in a MacJob, as opposed to Living The Dream of working in Teevee and working in a craft that has brought pleasure and beauty to millions. Not a particularly horrible person, just a devotee of the mediocre and a soulless servant of the crass.
*
The ex-employee I met later summed it up, saying that bottom-feeding independent companies trafficking in what Graham Linehan calls “funography,” are just BAD PLACES TO WORK, which still doesn’t really make sense to me. It seems like even that misguided show and that wretched company could have been tolerable with different people in charge — it’s incredible to me that you could find such a concentration of offensive idiots ANYWHERE. In some cut-throat environment where only the most ruthless prosper, none of them would have the smarts to survive. In a caring milieu where the dopey and inept receive nurturing and affection, their obnoxious personalities would have them kicked out into a blizzard.

I have to assume that the only reason they are all alive and working together is because their attempts to murder each other have all miscarried due to base incompetence.
February 6, 2008 at 4:29 pm
Way Down East !
Are you by chance familar with Halelujah the Hills? It’s Adolphas Mekas’ fabuloyus 1963 total nonsense tribute to the cinema (more movie jokes and references per minute than any film ever made) starring the unspeakably luscious Peter Beard who at one point runs stark naked through the snow (sending my teenage heart aflutter like no one before or since.)
Well at one point Adolpfas simply stops everything and inserts the ice rescue sequence from Way Down East — and then goes back to the non-story.
It’s as if he just couldn’t help himself.
February 6, 2008 at 6:46 pm
I haven’t seen any Mekases, alas.
I did manage to get a copy of Varda’s Thousand Nights of Cinema, but it turned out to be unsubtitled, so I have to wait until I can arange for David Wingrove to do a Benshi film translation. I like the look of it: the Lumiere Bros appear decorated with lightbulbs.
February 6, 2008 at 7:29 pm
Jonas’ diary films are require viewing: Walden, He Stand in the Desert Counting The Seconds of His Life, Scenes From the Life of Andy Warhol, Cassis, Willowbrook to name a few. Also his one fiction film Guns of the Trees is really great.
Adolfas made only a few films before becoming a film teacher. The Double-Barrelled Detective Story with Hurd Hatfield isn’t bad. But Hallelujah the Hills with its great Meyer Kupferman score, is a classic.
February 6, 2008 at 8:15 pm
How much Mekas is available on DVD now? I think our college library could be persuaded to buy some…they’re lamentably short on “experimental” stuff.
Am working on getting experimental filmmaker Matt Hulse to nominate some avant garde Euphoria.
February 6, 2008 at 9:11 pm
David about one or two years ago the Guardian ran an excellent article about the inherent explotation in the independent TV sector - reminded me of past horrors I’m glad not to be involved in that god for my work just for money job…
Oh and a friend of mine made a doc and was diddled out of his production fee by the exc producer who just declared himsef bancrupt and moved his assets elsewhere - may he rot in hell.
February 6, 2008 at 10:33 pm
Yeah, at least these guys PAID, and not too badly, considering the minute size of the budget. My problem was more to do with them being a hazard to any creative venture: if they’d just BUTT OUT some decent work could get done.
February 6, 2008 at 10:33 pm
Indeed, m.
Not sure how much of Jonas is available.
February 6, 2008 at 10:40 pm
I’ll do some Mekas-hunting online.
I remember an interview with that Frank Darabont guy where he said that one of exploitation king Charles Band’s favourite tricks was to just not pay the crew for the last week of work. He didn’t need them anymore, so why pay up? Horrible, if true.
Herzog’s producer on Rescue Dawn seems to have had a similar attitude, and a lot of major films shooting in Eastern Europe have had these kind of “cash-flow problems”.
February 8, 2008 at 6:58 am
It’s good to vent. Especially in the face of mediocrity, exploitation and plagiarizing . Talking of which.
Is it true that William Mcilvanney years ago took to STV the idea of turning his Laidlaw (gruff, Glasgow detective) series of Glasgow cop novels but was turned down? Apparently, months later the first Taggart (gruff Glasgow detective) appeared. In Glasgow Laidlaw is also the name one of two major car dealers. The other? That would be Taggart.
February 8, 2008 at 8:47 am
It’s a very small industry here so I was a little wary about mouthing off. Some of the people might recognise themselves from the above descriptions. Not that I’m exactly keen to work with any of them again, but I suspect from the YouTube thing that spite is part of their makeup.
But I decided that although my blog stats are reasonably healthy, the chances of them coming here are… relatively low. For one thing, none of them are interested in film or television!
February 8, 2008 at 7:29 pm
The Taggart thing is fascinating. If true, they must have been taking the piss.
I interned at STV for a few months and found the drama department utterly moribund. Any interesting idea would be summarily rejected before it could even be presented to the network, on the grounds that it would never get the go-ahead. Only gruff detective shows were considered — despite the fact that the network were complaining they never saw anything else from STV.
The head of development and the head of kids shows are now gone, but they have not been replaced — their jobs simply ceased to exist, were considered unnecessary.
February 8, 2008 at 7:34 pm
Just read up on the McIlvanney thing — he never took the books to STV and there’s no PROOF anybody there ever read them. So it COULD be coincidence…