Euphoria #18: Did you ever happen to hear…?
Marlene Dietrich’s Hot Voodoo number from Josef Von Sternberg’s BLONDE VENUS, suggested by David Melville (who writes as David Wingrove). An intravenous shot of pure Silver Nitrate Euphoria (a drug whose addictive properties are well documented).
Where did Josef Von Sternberg’s aesthetic sense come from? It’s like nothing on earth.
Part of the answer may be found, along with much else, in Little Jo’s autobiography, Fun in a Chinese Laundry, which serves as a kind of Rosetta Stone to his filmwork, cluing the reader in to sources of imagery, philosophy and incidents in the films. Crucially, Sternberg, as a child, lived next to Vienna’s famous Volksprater:
“Hundreds of shooting galleries, Punch and Judy and the inevitable Satan puppet, chalk-faced clowns in their dominoes, boats sliding from a high point down into water with a great splash, leather-faced dummies that groaned when slapped, pirouetting fleas, sword-swallowers, tumbling midgets and men on stilts, contortionists, jugglers and acrobats, wild swings with skirts flaring from them, proving that not all females had lost their undergarments, a forest of balloons, tattooed athletes, muscle-bulging weight-lifters, women who were sawed in half and apparently spent the rest of their lives truncated, trained dogs and elephants, tightropes that provided footing for a gourmet who feasted on a basket of the local sausages with horse-radish that made my mouth water, graceful ballerinas, grunting knife-throwers with screaming targets whose hair flowed down to the hems of their nightgowns, hatchet-throwing Indians and phlegmatic squaws, double-headed calves, members of the fair sex, fat and bearded, with thighs that could pillow an army, magicians who poured jugs of flaming liquid down their throats, drum-thumping cannibals and their wiggling harems, a glass maze from which the delighted customers stumbled with black eyes and gashed heads, hypnotists who practiced levitation and passed hoops around the dormant females swaying five feet from where they ought to have been, and the central figure of a huge Chinese mandarin with drooping moustaches longer than the tail of a horse revolving on a merry-g0-round to the tune of Ivanovici’s Donauwellen — what more could I have asked?”
When Fiona and I visited the Prater, it was mostly shut for the winter, so we shared the off-season experience of Cotten and Welles in THE THIRD MAN and Fontaine and Jourdan in LETTER FROM AN UNKNOWN WOMAN.


I like to think the fun of the fair, with its gaudy, venal and surreal hubbub, planted a seed in the young Jonas Sternberg.
Of course, a sensitive child in this environment could equally well have turned into Fellini. I tend to think that the interaction of genetics and environment is so complex, nobody could ever predict the outcome upon a single human being. Certainly not a human being like Sternberg. One possibility that occurs to me is that he is recreating this tatty, gaudy and vulgar spectacle in his work, but imbuing it with all the beauty and ecstasy and fear that a child would feel upon being exposed to the funfair for the first time.



Footnote: re-watched NO DIRECTION HOME last night, and Dylan’s childhood memories of the travelling fun-fair are the most evocative thing in it — and directly inform the last sequence of Todd Haynes’ I’M NOT THERE, in turn the most evocative sequence of that movie.
Footfootnote: Sternberg passed on some of his funfair impressions directly in THE CASE OF LENA SMITH (1929), a film which is now lost, apart from stills and a single four-minute fragment recovered by Hiroshi Komatsu of Tokyo’s Waseda University.
Get it on Youtube, Hiroshi!
January 14, 2008 at 2:36 pm
Good post and love the pics and cinematic references (none of them relating to “Star Wars”, thank God, a movie which seems to permeate the web like an ugly virus).
I loved “No Direction” home and it drove home the point once again just how much of his own creation Bob Dylan is…and his own man…
Thanks for this.
January 14, 2008 at 4:02 pm
No problem!
IS there a Star Wars — Blonde Venus connection? I would actually be amused and entertained if someone can show that there is. The first Star Wars is certainly a hotchpotch of influences, which is the level I enjoy it at to the extent that I can still get anything out of it at all.
I think Uma Thurman recreates the gorilla suit moment in Batman and Robin, a film which tried and failed to introduce a degree of Sternbergian camp back into the mainstream. It’s interesting that a lot of the negative fanboy reaction to that movie (which IS loud and boring and ugly) had a clearly homophobic subtext.
January 14, 2008 at 4:25 pm
There’s been a lot of talk of casting Uma as Dietrich in a biopic. A good choice in light most especially of her evocation of Botticelli’s Venus in Terry Gilliams’ woefully underrated The Adventures of Baron Munchausen.
Dietrich would have love Uma’s performance in Henry and June
January 14, 2008 at 4:55 pm
Ah, but if there’s one thing Marlene loathed, it was “vulgarity”. Which is pretty rich, coming from her.
Not 100% sure what the story of such a film would be. The TCM documentary used the Gabin romance as a lynchpin, but that was just one relationship out of manymanymany.
The Sternberg creative partnership is much more interesting to me, with Sternberg as main character. But a lot of that was kept private and mysterious, so any film would be a work of interpretative fiction.
January 14, 2008 at 5:43 pm
Have you seen Maximillian Schell’s Marlene ? It’s an interview film in which the subject refuses to appear on camera — a stement in and of itself of considerable import. The aged recluse once known as Marlene Dietrich couldn’t recreate herself for the camera and thus became an off-screen voice with her image a “structuring absence” (as Roland Barthes would say.)
January 14, 2008 at 7:03 pm
Yes, Marlene is a terrific film. Schell wanted very much to capture a last image of Dietrich, but she refused — and it actually enhances the film.
I was thinking of the term “structuring absence” as I watched I’m Not There. I would actually have preferred not to have had Dylan appear over the end credits, though it’s no biggie.
January 14, 2008 at 7:47 pm
The thing with Dylan, as Todd shows, is that we can never be sure of who we’re looking at from one persona to the next. Dietrich is always clear.
Have you ever read Jack Smith’s article “A Belated Appreciation of V.S.” ? He regards Dietrich and Sternberg as one and the same.
January 14, 2008 at 8:40 pm
So did Sternberg! “I am Miss Dietrich.”
I read it in the Criterion Collection Scarlet Empress DVD (which people should order at once). Great stuff. Based on that and his truly revolutionary Maria Montez piece, I’d love to read more.
Maria Montez nearly played Death in Cocteau’s Orphee. When Cocteau decided to make the film cheaply and cast his friends, her husband Jean-Pierre Aumont told her she’d play other, more beautiful roles.
“But darling, DEATH should be beautiful!”
January 14, 2008 at 8:43 pm
She was too much.
Her daughter Tina (who passed away rather recently) was teriffic in Bertolucci’s Partner, Garrel’s Le Lit de la Vierge, Losey’s Modesty Blaise and Minnelli’s A Matter of Time.
January 14, 2008 at 10:32 pm
i think richard burton said clint eastwood had “dynamic lethargy”, and that is essentially the way i feel about marlene dietrich in this clip. it’s like she’s conserving energy in order to generate that weird glow
January 14, 2008 at 10:35 pm
Beautiful! You should have your own blog, Alex. Or if you want to write anything for this one, I’ll post it!
Dietrich was always lit brighter than her co-stars, with a very hot light blasting the back of her head for that halo effect. No matter where in a room she stands, she has her own lighting.
January 15, 2008 at 1:42 am
really? i would love to do that! i will try to think of a topic and then i will get back to you
January 15, 2008 at 11:10 am
Great. Just pick an interesting film or subject and let rip!